linux-alpha.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH-tip v7 01/15] locking/rwsem: relocate rwsem_down_read_failed()
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:30:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1508351431-22375-2-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1508351431-22375-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>

The rwsem_down_read_failed*() functions were relocted from above the
optimistic spinning section to below that section. This enables
them to use functions in that section in future patches. There is no
code change.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index 1fefe6d..db5dedf 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -219,81 +219,6 @@ static void __rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
 }
 
 /*
- * Wait for the read lock to be granted
- */
-static inline struct rw_semaphore __sched *
-__rwsem_down_read_failed_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
-{
-	long count, adjustment = -RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS;
-	struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
-	DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
-
-	waiter.task = current;
-	waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
-	if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
-		adjustment += RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS;
-	list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
-
-	/* we're now waiting on the lock, but no longer actively locking */
-	count = atomic_long_add_return(adjustment, &sem->count);
-
-	/*
-	 * If there are no active locks, wake the front queued process(es).
-	 *
-	 * If there are no writers and we are first in the queue,
-	 * wake our own waiter to join the existing active readers !
-	 */
-	if (count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS ||
-	    (count > RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS &&
-	     adjustment != -RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS))
-		__rwsem_mark_wake(sem, RWSEM_WAKE_ANY, &wake_q);
-
-	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
-	wake_up_q(&wake_q);
-
-	/* wait to be given the lock */
-	while (true) {
-		set_current_state(state);
-		if (!waiter.task)
-			break;
-		if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
-			raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
-			if (waiter.task)
-				goto out_nolock;
-			raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
-			break;
-		}
-		schedule();
-	}
-
-	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
-	return sem;
-out_nolock:
-	list_del(&waiter.list);
-	if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
-		atomic_long_add(-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, &sem->count);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
-	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
-	return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
-}
-
-__visible struct rw_semaphore * __sched
-rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	return __rwsem_down_read_failed_common(sem, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rwsem_down_read_failed);
-
-__visible struct rw_semaphore * __sched
-rwsem_down_read_failed_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	return __rwsem_down_read_failed_common(sem, TASK_KILLABLE);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rwsem_down_read_failed_killable);
-
-/*
  * This function must be called with the sem->wait_lock held to prevent
  * race conditions between checking the rwsem wait list and setting the
  * sem->count accordingly.
@@ -488,6 +413,81 @@ static inline bool rwsem_has_spinner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 #endif
 
 /*
+ * Wait for the read lock to be granted
+ */
+static inline struct rw_semaphore __sched *
+__rwsem_down_read_failed_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
+{
+	long count, adjustment = -RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS;
+	struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
+	DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
+
+	waiter.task = current;
+	waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
+	if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
+		adjustment += RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS;
+	list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
+
+	/* we're now waiting on the lock, but no longer actively locking */
+	count = atomic_long_add_return(adjustment, &sem->count);
+
+	/*
+	 * If there are no active locks, wake the front queued process(es).
+	 *
+	 * If there are no writers and we are first in the queue,
+	 * wake our own waiter to join the existing active readers !
+	 */
+	if (count == RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS ||
+	    (count > RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS &&
+	     adjustment != -RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS))
+		__rwsem_mark_wake(sem, RWSEM_WAKE_ANY, &wake_q);
+
+	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
+	wake_up_q(&wake_q);
+
+	/* wait to be given the lock */
+	while (true) {
+		set_current_state(state);
+		if (!waiter.task)
+			break;
+		if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
+			raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
+			if (waiter.task)
+				goto out_nolock;
+			raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
+			break;
+		}
+		schedule();
+	}
+
+	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+	return sem;
+out_nolock:
+	list_del(&waiter.list);
+	if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
+		atomic_long_add(-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, &sem->count);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
+	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+	return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
+}
+
+__visible struct rw_semaphore * __sched
+rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	return __rwsem_down_read_failed_common(sem, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rwsem_down_read_failed);
+
+__visible struct rw_semaphore * __sched
+rwsem_down_read_failed_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	return __rwsem_down_read_failed_common(sem, TASK_KILLABLE);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rwsem_down_read_failed_killable);
+
+/*
  * Wait until we successfully acquire the write lock
  */
 static inline struct rw_semaphore *
-- 
1.8.3.1


  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-18 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-18 18:30 [PATCH-tip v7 00/15] locking/rwsem: Rework rwsem-xadd & enable new rwsem features Waiman Long
2017-10-18 18:30 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2017-10-18 18:30 ` [PATCH-tip v7 02/15] locking/rwsem: Implement a new locking scheme Waiman Long
2017-10-18 18:30 ` [PATCH-tip v7 03/15] locking/rwsem: Move owner setting code from rwsem.c to rwsem-xadd.h Waiman Long
2017-10-18 18:30 ` [PATCH-tip v7 04/15] locking/rwsem: Remove kernel/locking/rwsem.h Waiman Long
2017-10-18 18:30 ` [PATCH-tip v7 05/15] locking/rwsem: Move rwsem internal function declarations to rwsem-xadd.h Waiman Long
2017-10-18 18:30 ` [PATCH-tip v7 06/15] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files Waiman Long
2017-10-18 18:30 ` [PATCH-tip v7 07/15] locking/rwsem: Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvation Waiman Long
2017-10-18 18:30 ` [PATCH-tip v7 08/15] locking/rwsem: Enable readers spinning on writer Waiman Long
2017-10-18 18:30 ` [PATCH-tip v7 09/15] locking/rwsem: Make rwsem_spin_on_owner() return a tri-state value Waiman Long
2017-10-18 18:30 ` [PATCH-tip v7 10/15] locking/rwsem: Enable count-based spinning on reader Waiman Long
2017-10-18 18:30 ` [PATCH-tip v7 11/15] locking/rwsem: Remove rwsem_wake spinlock optimization Waiman Long
2017-10-18 18:30 ` [PATCH-tip v7 12/15] locking/rwsem: Eliminate redundant writer wakeup calls Waiman Long
2017-10-18 18:30 ` [PATCH-tip v7 13/15] locking/rwsem: Improve fairness to writers Waiman Long
2017-10-18 18:30 ` [PATCH-tip v7 14/15] locking/rwsem: Make waiting writer to optimistically spin for the lock Waiman Long
2017-10-18 18:30 ` [PATCH-tip v7 15/15] locking/rwsem: Wake up all readers in wait queue Waiman Long
2017-10-19 15:21 ` [PATCH-tip v7 00/15] locking/rwsem: Rework rwsem-xadd & enable new rwsem features Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1508351431-22375-2-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).