From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Balint Cristian Subject: Re: Compiling latest 2.6 bk snapshot on Alpha Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 18:44:43 -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <200309031844.43208.rezso@rdsor.ro> References: <20030903143157.GA17699@localhost> <20030903150024.GA18306@localhost> <20030903151532.GH14376@lug-owl.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20030903151532.GH14376@lug-owl.de> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Jan-Benedict Glaw , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org If using RedHat-7.2 based thing on alpha or older you can use my own maintained RH rawhide for alpha: ftp.rdsor.ro/pub/Linux/Distributions/AlphaLinux There can find very latest gcc/binutils/glibc shaga, it must fit OK with any redhat for alphas. I have no problem compiling latest kernel with tham. Cristian On Wednesday 03 September 2003 11:15, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Wed, 2003-09-03 11:00:24 -0400, Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer > > > wrote in message <20030903150024.GA18306@localhost>: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 04:40:31PM +0200, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > Please check your binutils version. Here is the one I use, with great > > > success : > > > > > > maz@panther:/mnt/i386/linux-2.5$ alpha-linux-ld --version > > > GNU ld version 2.13.90.0.18 20030121 > > > > Mine is: GNU ld version 2.14.90.0.5 20030722 Debian GNU/Linux > > I've just started a compile run with exactly this ld and gcc-3.3.2 > 20030812. This may take a while (it's a 166MHz NoName...). > > Maybe you've simply created a too large kernel image. Have you compiled > many features into the kernel (where modules would have worked also...)? > > MfG, JBG -- Life in itself has no meaning. Life is an opportunity to create meaning. \|/ ____ \|/ "@'/ .. \`@" /_| \__/ |_\ \__U_/