From: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
To: Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
alpha@steudten.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: Kernel Panic: kernel-2.6.0-test9-bk21 for alpha in scsi context ll_rw_blk.c
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 02:19:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031118021922.A7816@den.park.msu.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87islid5tq.fsf@student.uni-tuebingen.de>; from falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de on Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:48:49PM +0100
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:48:49PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Well, the architecture manual requires these instructions have no
> visible effect whatsoever, i. e. they never trap.
No. Unaligned != invalid.
We shouldn't prefetch the spinlocks on UP.
Ivan.
--- 2.6/include/asm-alpha/processor.h Sat Oct 25 22:44:54 2003
+++ linux/include/asm-alpha/processor.h Tue Nov 18 01:48:39 2003
@@ -78,6 +78,11 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_stru
#define ARCH_HAS_PREFETCHW
#define ARCH_HAS_SPINLOCK_PREFETCH
+#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
+/* Nothing to prefetch. */
+#define spin_lock_prefetch(lock) do { } while (0)
+#endif
+
#if __GNUC__ > 3 || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1)
extern inline void prefetch(const void *ptr)
{
@@ -89,10 +94,13 @@ extern inline void prefetchw(const void
__builtin_prefetch(ptr, 1, 3);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
extern inline void spin_lock_prefetch(const void *ptr)
{
__builtin_prefetch(ptr, 1, 3);
}
+#endif
+
#else
extern inline void prefetch(const void *ptr)
{
@@ -104,10 +112,13 @@ extern inline void prefetchw(const void
__asm__ ("ldq $31,%0" : : "m"(*(char *)ptr));
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
extern inline void spin_lock_prefetch(const void *ptr)
{
__asm__ ("ldq $31,%0" : : "m"(*(char *)ptr));
}
+#endif
+
#endif /* GCC 3.1 */
#endif /* __ASM_ALPHA_PROCESSOR_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-17 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-17 20:02 BUG: Kernel Panic: kernel-2.6.0-test9-bk21 for alpha in scsi context ll_rw_blk.c Thomas Steudten
2003-11-17 21:11 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-17 21:31 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-11-17 21:34 ` Thomas Steudten
2003-11-17 21:48 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-11-17 23:19 ` Ivan Kokshaysky [this message]
2003-11-18 21:29 ` SOLVED: " Thomas Steudten
2004-01-10 16:59 ` BUG: Kernel Panic: kernel-2.6.1 " Thomas Steudten
2004-01-11 10:26 ` Oliver Pitzeier
[not found] ` <20040110143409.0e591596.akpm@osdl.org>
2004-01-11 11:45 ` Relocation overflow vs section kernel-2.6.1 for alpha Thomas Steudten
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031118021922.A7816@den.park.msu.ru \
--to=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=alpha@steudten.com \
--cc=falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).