* INFO alpha CPU: Locking API testsuite: Results kernel 2.6.18.1
@ 2006-11-04 14:27 alpha @ steudten Engineering
2006-11-08 9:32 ` Jarek Poplawski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: alpha @ steudten Engineering @ 2006-11-04 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LinuxAlpha, LKML
kernel-2.6.18.1 ALPHA SX164
No "failed" on x86.
------------------------
| Locking API testsuite:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| spin |wlock |rlock |mutex | wsem | rsem |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-A deadlock:failed|failed| ok |failed|failed|failed|
A-B-B-A deadlock:failed|failed| ok |failed|failed|failed|
A-B-B-C-C-A deadlock:failed|failed| ok |failed|failed|failed|
A-B-C-A-B-C deadlock:failed|failed| ok |failed|failed|failed|
A-B-B-C-C-D-D-A deadlock:failed|failed| ok |failed|failed|failed|
A-B-C-D-B-D-D-A deadlock:failed|failed| ok |failed|failed|failed|
A-B-C-D-B-C-D-A deadlock:failed|failed| ok |failed|failed|failed|
double unlock: ok | ok |failed|failed|failed|failed|
initialize held:failed|failed|failed|failed|failed|failed|
bad unlock order: ok | ok | ok | ok | ok | ok |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
recursive read-lock: | ok | |failed|
recursive read-lock #2: | ok | |failed|
mixed read-write-lock: |failed| |failed|
mixed write-read-lock: |failed| |failed|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
hard-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/12:failed|failed| ok |
soft-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/12:failed|failed| ok |
hard-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21:failed|failed| ok |
soft-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21:failed|failed| ok |
sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/12:failed|failed| ok |
sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/21:failed|failed| ok |
hard-safe-A + irqs-on/12:failed|failed| ok |
soft-safe-A + irqs-on/12:failed|failed| ok |
hard-safe-A + irqs-on/21:failed|failed| ok |
soft-safe-A + irqs-on/21:failed|failed| ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123:failed|failed| ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123:failed|failed| ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/132:failed|failed| ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/132:failed|failed| ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/213:failed|failed| ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/213:failed|failed| ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/231:failed|failed| ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/231:failed|failed| ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/312:failed|failed| ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/312:failed|failed| ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/321:failed|failed| ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/321:failed|failed| ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/123:failed|failed| ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/123:failed|failed| ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/132:failed|failed| ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/132:failed|failed| ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/213:failed|failed| ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/213:failed|failed| ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/231:failed|failed| ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/231:failed|failed| ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/312:failed|failed| ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/312:failed|failed| ok |
hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/321:failed|failed| ok |
soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #2/321:failed|failed| ok |
hard-irq lock-inversion/123:failed|failed| ok |
soft-irq lock-inversion/123:failed|failed| ok |
hard-irq lock-inversion/132:failed|failed| ok |
soft-irq lock-inversion/132:failed|failed| ok |
hard-irq lock-inversion/213:failed|failed| ok |
soft-irq lock-inversion/213:failed|failed| ok |
hard-irq lock-inversion/231:failed|failed| ok |
soft-irq lock-inversion/231:failed|failed| ok |
hard-irq lock-inversion/312:failed|failed| ok |
soft-irq lock-inversion/312:failed|failed| ok |
hard-irq lock-inversion/321:failed|failed| ok |
soft-irq lock-inversion/321:failed|failed| ok |
hard-irq read-recursion/123: ok |
soft-irq read-recursion/123: ok |
hard-irq read-recursion/132: ok |
soft-irq read-recursion/132: ok |
hard-irq read-recursion/213: ok |
soft-irq read-recursion/213: ok |
hard-irq read-recursion/231: ok |
soft-irq read-recursion/231: ok |
hard-irq read-recursion/312: ok |
soft-irq read-recursion/312: ok |
hard-irq read-recursion/321: ok |
soft-irq read-recursion/321: ok |
--------------------------------------------------------
143 out of 218 testcases failed, as expected. |
----------------------------------------------------
---
Steudten Engineering
http://alpha.steudten.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: INFO alpha CPU: Locking API testsuite: Results kernel 2.6.18.1
2006-11-04 14:27 INFO alpha CPU: Locking API testsuite: Results kernel 2.6.18.1 alpha @ steudten Engineering
@ 2006-11-08 9:32 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-11-08 11:08 ` alpha @ steudten Engineering
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jarek Poplawski @ 2006-11-08 9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-alpha
On 04-11-2006 15:27, alpha @ steudten Engineering wrote:
> kernel-2.6.18.1 ALPHA SX164
> No "failed" on x86.
> ------------------------
> | Locking API testsuite:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | spin |wlock |rlock |mutex | wsem | rsem |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> A-A deadlock:failed|failed| ok |failed|failed|failed|
...
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 143 out of 218 testcases failed, as expected. |
> ----------------------------------------------------
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y ?
Jarek P.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: INFO alpha CPU: Locking API testsuite: Results kernel 2.6.18.1
2006-11-08 9:32 ` Jarek Poplawski
@ 2006-11-08 11:08 ` alpha @ steudten Engineering
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: alpha @ steudten Engineering @ 2006-11-08 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-alpha
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y ?
It't not there/set! It depends on:
config PROVE_LOCKING
bool "Lock debugging: prove locking correctness"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT && STACKTRACE_SUPPORT && LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
select LOCKDEP
so it looks like only DEBUG_KERNEL is set for alpha.
Maybe some dependencies are missing.. I'll check this.
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On 04-11-2006 15:27, alpha @ steudten Engineering wrote:
>> kernel-2.6.18.1 ALPHA SX164
>> No "failed" on x86.
>> ------------------------
>> | Locking API testsuite:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> | spin |wlock |rlock |mutex | wsem | rsem |
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> A-A deadlock:failed|failed| ok |failed|failed|failed|
> ...
>> --------------------------------------------------------
>> 143 out of 218 testcases failed, as expected. |
>> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-11-08 11:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-11-04 14:27 INFO alpha CPU: Locking API testsuite: Results kernel 2.6.18.1 alpha @ steudten Engineering
2006-11-08 9:32 ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-11-08 11:08 ` alpha @ steudten Engineering
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).