From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] Add new macros for page-aligned data and bss sections. Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 19:44:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20090501174457.GA26559@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <1241121253-32341-1-git-send-email-tabbott@mit.edu> <1241121253-32341-2-git-send-email-tabbott@mit.edu> <20090501091848.GB18326@uranus.ravnborg.org> <49FB2449.1010301@zytor.com> <20090501171717.GA26401@uranus.ravnborg.org> <49FB2EDC.9050300@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49FB2EDC.9050300@zytor.com> Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Tim Abbott , Linux kernel mailing list , Anders Kaseorg , Waseem Daher , Denys Vlasenko , Jeff Arnold , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Bryan Wu , Chris Zankel , Cyrill Gorcunov , David Howells , "David S. Miller" , dev-etrax@axis.com, Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Ungerer , Haavard Skinnemoen , Heiko Carstens , Helge Deller , Hirokazu Takata , Ingo Molnar , Jeff Dike , Jesper Nilsson , Kyle McMartin , Linus Torvalds On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 10:18:20AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 09:33:13AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> Tim Abbott wrote: > >>> On Fri, 1 May 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 03:54:08PM -0400, Tim Abbott wrote: > >>>>> +#define __PAGE_ALIGNED_DATA .section ".data.page_aligned", "aw", @progbits > >>>>> +#define __PAGE_ALIGNED_BSS .section ".bss.page_aligned", "aw", @nobits > >>>> It is my understanding that the linker will automatically > >>>> assume nobits for section names starting with .bss and likewise > >>>> progbits for section names starting with .data - so we can leave them out? > >>> I believe that is correct. > >>> > >> ... but that doesn't mean it's the right thing to do. > >> > >> It's better to be fully explicit when macroizing this kind of stuff. > >> This is part of why macroizing it is good: it means we end up with *one* > >> place that determines this stuff, not some magic heuristics in the linker. > > > > Do you know if we can use % in place of @? > > I could see that gas supports both - at least in trunk in cvs. > > > > I think it might depend on the architecture(!)... but it would > definitely have to be an issue with testing a bunch of different versions. > > What's wrong with @? arm does not support it :-( I recall it denote a comment in arm assembler. I could do some magic to detect the ARM case but I'm reluctant to do so. I could also ignore the arm issue for now as it is not used by arm, but that strikes me as the wrong approach. Sam