Alpha arch development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Tracy <rct@gherkin.frus.com>
To: Uwe Schindler <uwe@thetaphi.de>
Cc: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
	mattst88@gmail.com, mcree@orcon.net.nz
Subject: Re: recent udev upgrade failure on alpha
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:17:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110715151706.GA9506@gherkin.frus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00af01cc42f8$0c691e40$253b5ac0$@thetaphi.de>

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 04:04:00PM +0200, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> (...)
> I tried then to upgrade the package "udev" (was on hold, to prevent me from
> making system unbootable), with the hope that the inotify is working with
> this debian kernel. Unfortunately that's not the case, UDEV complains about
> missing inotify.
> 
> So is the patch below already included in some kernel images available? Or
> does somebody have a recent udev version as .deb packages?

I still have (and am using) my modified "udev" package
(udev_166-1_alpha.deb: includes the patch you quoted in your original
message).  I can send it your way if you wish.  In truth, the only thing
you need is "/sbin/udevd" from that package to be operational, and I can
send you just that piece if you prefer.  Just let me know.

The underlying problem isn't anything missing in the kernel (at least
when built from the mainline kernel.org source): inotify_init1() is
definitely there.  The problem is the userspace call to inotify_init1()
in the current Alpha version of libc6.1 is a stub function.  I elected
to rebuild the "udev" package with a valid workaround rather than risk
modifying and having to debug "libc" :-).

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Tracy          |  "Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit
rct@frus.com       |   upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin
                   |   slitting throats."	-- H.L. Mencken
------------------------------------------------------------------------

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-15 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-24  7:02 recent udev upgrade failure on alpha Bob Tracy
2011-02-24  7:51 ` Bob Tracy
2011-02-24 10:09   ` Uwe Schindler
2011-02-24 15:11     ` Matt Turner
2011-02-24 18:55       ` Uwe Schindler
     [not found]       ` <008101cbd454$02036770$060a3650$@thetaphi.de>
     [not found]         ` <005301cc1555$58f92c30$0aeb8490$@thetaphi.de>
     [not found]           ` <20110518145605.GJ3539@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
2011-05-18 15:28             ` Uwe Schindler
2011-05-18 18:37               ` Bob Tracy
2011-07-15 14:04   ` Uwe Schindler
2011-07-15 15:17     ` Bob Tracy [this message]
2011-07-15 15:46       ` Uwe Schindler
2011-08-15 17:09         ` Uwe Schindler
2011-08-15 17:28           ` Uwe Schindler
2011-02-24  9:54 ` Michael Cree
2011-02-24 10:25   ` Bob Tracy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110715151706.GA9506@gherkin.frus.com \
    --to=rct@gherkin.frus.com \
    --cc=debian-alpha@lists.debian.org \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=mcree@orcon.net.nz \
    --cc=uwe@thetaphi.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox