From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org,
linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org, linux-m32r-ja@ml.linux-m32r.org,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-am33-list@redhat.com,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, dhowells@redhat.com,
jejb@parisc-linux.org, linux390@de.ibm.com, x86@kernel.org,
cmetcalf@tilera.com, linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Simplify the Linux kernel by reducing its state space
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:54:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120331165401.GD2450@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWTB+_AtqM6JixY=Oo_zmzX_dNxnivpARBYSbPJzp4t6A@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 06:40:30PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 18:33, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Although there have been numerous complaints about the complexity of
> > parallel programming (especially over the past 5-10 years), the plain
> > truth is that the incremental complexity of parallel programming over
> > that of sequential programming is not as large as is commonly believed.
> > Despite that you might have heard, the mind-numbing complexity of modern
> > computer systems is not due so much to there being multiple CPUs, but
> > rather to there being any CPUs at all. In short, for the ultimate in
> > computer-system simplicity, the optimal choice is NR_CPUS=0.
> >
> > This commit therefore limits kernel builds to zero CPUs. This change
> > has the beneficial side effect of rendering all kernel bugs harmless.
> > Furthermore, this commit enables additional beneficial changes, for
> > example, the removal of those parts of the kernel that are not needed
> > when there are zero CPUs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > ---
> >
> > alpha/Kconfig | 11 ++++++-----
> > arm/Kconfig | 6 +++---
> > blackfin/Kconfig | 3 ++-
> > hexagon/Kconfig | 9 +++++----
> > ia64/Kconfig | 9 +++++----
> > m32r/Kconfig | 10 ++++++----
> > mips/Kconfig | 21 +++++++++++----------
> > mn10300/Kconfig | 3 ++-
> > parisc/Kconfig | 6 +++---
> > powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype | 8 ++++----
> > s390/Kconfig | 12 +++++++-----
> > sh/Kconfig | 11 ++++++-----
> > sparc/Kconfig | 8 ++++----
> > tile/Kconfig | 9 +++++----
> > x86/Kconfig | 16 +++++++++-------
> > 15 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>
> You forgot to fix half of the architectures, a.o. m68k?
I must confess that I fixed only the SMP-capable architectures.
I of course would welcome additions for UP-only architectures.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-31 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-31 16:33 [PATCH RFC] Simplify the Linux kernel by reducing its state space Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-31 16:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-03-31 16:54 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-03-31 19:57 ` Linas Vepstas
2012-03-31 20:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-31 20:15 ` Linas Vepstas
2012-03-31 20:25 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-03-31 20:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-31 21:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-03-31 21:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-31 22:19 ` Lorenz Kolb
2012-03-31 22:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-31 22:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-01 1:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-01 17:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-01 18:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-01 10:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-01 18:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120331165401.GD2450@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-am33-list@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m32r-ja@ml.linux-m32r.org \
--cc=linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).