From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: dl8bcu@dl8bcu.de, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [regression] boot failure on alpha, bisected
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 21:10:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121008191004.GA10306@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUjqogJ5Db1wCZz4v6OEutDPbcF0a=zc=ZCJS7-8rYDqw@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/08, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Just wondering. As this is on an SMP system, perhaps the
> read_barrier_depends() vs. smp_read_barrier_depends() matters
> here?
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1209.3/00555.html
Yes, thanks, I do remember about this ;)
This will come as 2/2 which also removes the unnecessary "work = NULL"
initialization.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-08 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-06 20:47 [regression] boot failure on alpha, bisected Thorsten Kranzkowski
2012-10-07 16:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-07 17:08 ` Al Viro
2012-10-07 17:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-07 19:39 ` Al Viro
2012-10-08 14:14 ` Dialup Jon Norstog
2012-10-08 14:14 ` Dialup Jon Norstog
2012-10-08 18:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-07 17:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-07 18:04 ` Thorsten Kranzkowski
2012-10-07 19:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-07 19:41 ` Thorsten Kranzkowski
2012-10-08 18:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-10-08 19:10 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-10-12 16:03 ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was: [regression] boot failure on alpha, bisected) Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-12 16:03 ` [PATCH 1/1] task_work: Add local_irq_enable() into task_work_run() Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-13 1:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-13 1:48 ` Al Viro
2012-10-13 9:59 ` Michael Cree
2012-10-13 15:39 ` Al Viro
2012-10-13 13:06 ` Thorsten Kranzkowski
2012-10-12 22:18 ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was: [regression] boot failure on alpha, bisected) Al Viro
2012-10-14 18:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-14 18:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121008191004.GA10306@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=dl8bcu@dl8bcu.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).