[PATCH 4.9 124/329] locking/xchg/alpha: Add unconditional memory barrier to cmpxchg()

[PATCH 4.9 124/329] locking/xchg/alpha: Add unconditional memory barrier to cmpxchg()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit cb13b424e986aed68d74cbaec3449ea23c50e167 ]

Continuing along with the fight against smp_read_barrier_depends() [1]
(or rather, against its improper use), add an unconditional barrier to
cmpxchg.  This guarantees that dependency ordering is preserved when a
dependency is headed by an unsuccessful cmpxchg.  As it turns out, the
change could enable further simplification of LKMM as proposed in [2].

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150884953419377&w=2
    https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150884946319353&w=2
    https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151215810824468&w=2
    https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151215816324484&w=2

[2] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151881978314872&w=2

Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519152356-4804-1-git-send-email-parri.andrea@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h |   15 +++++++--------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h
+++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h
@@ -127,10 +127,9 @@ ____xchg(, volatile void *ptr, unsigned
  * store NEW in MEM.  Return the initial value in MEM.  Success is
  * indicated by comparing RETURN with OLD.
  *
- * The memory barrier should be placed in SMP only when we actually
- * make the change. If we don't change anything (so if the returned
- * prev is equal to old) then we aren't acquiring anything new and
- * we don't need any memory barrier as far I can tell.
+ * The memory barrier is placed in SMP unconditionally, in order to
+ * guarantee that dependency ordering is preserved when a dependency
+ * is headed by an unsuccessful operation.
  */
 
 static inline unsigned long
@@ -149,8 +148,8 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u8, volatile char *m, unsig
 	"	or	%1,%2,%2\n"
 	"	stq_c	%2,0(%4)\n"
 	"	beq	%2,3f\n"
-		__ASM__MB
 	"2:\n"
+		__ASM__MB
 	".subsection 2\n"
 	"3:	br	1b\n"
 	".previous"
@@ -176,8 +175,8 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u16, volatile short *m, uns
 	"	or	%1,%2,%2\n"
 	"	stq_c	%2,0(%4)\n"
 	"	beq	%2,3f\n"
-		__ASM__MB
 	"2:\n"
+		__ASM__MB
 	".subsection 2\n"
 	"3:	br	1b\n"
 	".previous"
@@ -199,8 +198,8 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u32, volatile int *m, int o
 	"	mov %4,%1\n"
 	"	stl_c %1,%2\n"
 	"	beq %1,3f\n"
-		__ASM__MB
 	"2:\n"
+		__ASM__MB
 	".subsection 2\n"
 	"3:	br 1b\n"
 	".previous"
@@ -222,8 +221,8 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u64, volatile long *m, unsi
 	"	mov %4,%1\n"
 	"	stq_c %1,%2\n"
 	"	beq %1,3f\n"
-		__ASM__MB
 	"2:\n"
+		__ASM__MB
 	".subsection 2\n"
 	"3:	br 1b\n"
 	".previous"

[PATCH 4.9 136/329] locking/xchg/alpha: Fix xchg() and cmpxchg() memory ordering bugs

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 472e8c55cf6622d1c112dc2bc777f68bbd4189db ]

Successful RMW operations are supposed to be fully ordered, but
Alpha's xchg() and cmpxchg() do not meet this requirement.

Will Deacon noticed the bug:

  > So MP using xchg:
  >
  > WRITE_ONCE(x, 1)
  > xchg(y, 1)
  >
  > smp_load_acquire(y) == 1
  > READ_ONCE(x) == 0
  >
  > would be allowed.

... which thus violates the above requirement.

Fix it by adding a leading smp_mb() to the xchg() and cmpxchg() implementations.

Reported-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519291488-5752-1-git-send-email-parri.andrea@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h |   21 ++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h
+++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
  * Atomic exchange.
  * Since it can be used to implement critical sections
  * it must clobber "memory" (also for interrupts in UP).
+ *
+ * The leading and the trailing memory barriers guarantee that these
+ * operations are fully ordered.
+ *
  */
 
 static inline unsigned long
@@ -18,6 +22,7 @@ ____xchg(_u8, volatile char *m, unsigned
 {
 	unsigned long ret, tmp, addr64;
 
+	smp_mb();
 	__asm__ __volatile__(
 	"	andnot	%4,7,%3\n"
 	"	insbl	%1,%4,%1\n"
@@ -42,6 +47,7 @@ ____xchg(_u16, volatile short *m, unsign
 {
 	unsigned long ret, tmp, addr64;
 
+	smp_mb();
 	__asm__ __volatile__(
 	"	andnot	%4,7,%3\n"
 	"	inswl	%1,%4,%1\n"
@@ -66,6 +72,7 @@ ____xchg(_u32, volatile int *m, unsigned
 {
 	unsigned long dummy;
 
+	smp_mb();
 	__asm__ __volatile__(
 	"1:	ldl_l %0,%4\n"
 	"	bis $31,%3,%1\n"
@@ -86,6 +93,7 @@ ____xchg(_u64, volatile long *m, unsigne
 {
 	unsigned long dummy;
 
+	smp_mb();
 	__asm__ __volatile__(
 	"1:	ldq_l %0,%4\n"
 	"	bis $31,%3,%1\n"
@@ -127,9 +135,12 @@ ____xchg(, volatile void *ptr, unsigned
  * store NEW in MEM.  Return the initial value in MEM.  Success is
  * indicated by comparing RETURN with OLD.
  *
- * The memory barrier is placed in SMP unconditionally, in order to
- * guarantee that dependency ordering is preserved when a dependency
- * is headed by an unsuccessful operation.
+ * The leading and the trailing memory barriers guarantee that these
+ * operations are fully ordered.
+ *
+ * The trailing memory barrier is placed in SMP unconditionally, in
+ * order to guarantee that dependency ordering is preserved when a
+ * dependency is headed by an unsuccessful operation.
  */
 
 static inline unsigned long
@@ -137,6 +148,7 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u8, volatile char *m, unsig
 {
 	unsigned long prev, tmp, cmp, addr64;
 
+	smp_mb();
 	__asm__ __volatile__(
 	"	andnot	%5,7,%4\n"
 	"	insbl	%1,%5,%1\n"
@@ -164,6 +176,7 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u16, volatile short *m, uns
 {
 	unsigned long prev, tmp, cmp, addr64;
 
+	smp_mb();
 	__asm__ __volatile__(
 	"	andnot	%5,7,%4\n"
 	"	inswl	%1,%5,%1\n"
@@ -191,6 +204,7 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u32, volatile int *m, int o
 {
 	unsigned long prev, cmp;
 
+	smp_mb();
 	__asm__ __volatile__(
 	"1:	ldl_l %0,%5\n"
 	"	cmpeq %0,%3,%1\n"
@@ -214,6 +228,7 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u64, volatile long *m, unsi
 {
 	unsigned long prev, cmp;
 
+	smp_mb();
 	__asm__ __volatile__(
 	"1:	ldq_l %0,%5\n"
 	"	cmpeq %0,%3,%1\n"