From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/13] mm: remove __ARCH_HAS_4LEVEL_HACK and include/asm-generic/4level-fixup.h Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 12:02:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20191104100221.GC23288@rapoport-lnx> References: <1572850587-20314-1-git-send-email-rppt@kernel.org> <1572850587-20314-14-git-send-email-rppt@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1572861754; bh=RwuWoZThXjDNqHvn7aTTzoFOSaLFxJpu4JuE9FFAq2g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZQXJDyCwPvvErBhc/JPFvqf0ahcZeThDhCNKls9A5hiFMXg7/bxxaR+FRMEZqomQo 7UkvkxzVQJ8UmcmpblINg/P6vMg4z3dq8+ii2/Ci/olfoMvg0slJoe+lmMsP+7zPv5 4p/WigolfFBvLYahqoidIrM5ZrPlGWpuHfVEwAZI= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Linux-MM , Andrew Morton , Anton Ivanov , "David S. Miller" , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greentime Hu , Greg Ungerer , Helge Deller , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Jeff Dike , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Linus Torvalds , Mark Salter , Matt Turner , Michal Simek , Peter Rosin , Richard Weinberger , Rolf Eike Beer , Russell King , Sam On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:11:51AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 7:58 AM Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > From: Mike Rapoport > > > > There are no architectures that use include/asm-generic/4level-fixup.h > > therefore it can be removed along with __ARCH_HAS_4LEVEL_HACK define. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport > > For asm-generic: > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > Have you discussed how the series should get merged? I assume an initial > set of patches can just go through architecture maintainer trees, but > whatever patches don't get picked up that way would go through either > Andrew's -mm tree (for memory management) or my asm-generic tree > (for cross-architecture cleanups). I thought that the entire set could go via -mm or asm-generic, but if architecture maintainers would prefer to pick relevant patches to the arch trees, I'll resend the rest afterwards. > Since there is still at least one regression, I expect not to do anything > for now. Please let me know when/if you expect me to merge the > remaining patches. Sure, thanks! > Arnd -- Sincerely yours, Mike.