From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] arm64: lto: Strengthen READ_ONCE() to acquire when CLANG_LTO=y Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 11:16:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20200708091620.GF597537@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20200630173734.14057-19-will@kernel.org> <20200701170722.4rte5ssnmrn2uqzg@bakewell.cambridge.arm.com> <20200702072301.GA15963@willie-the-truck> <20200706160023.GB10992@arm.com> <20200706163455.GV9247@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20200706170556.GE10992@arm.com> <20200706173628.GZ9247@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20200707102915.GI10992@arm.com> <20200707225122.GJ9247@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=2Hfa1uIvYhCo4qIOtwYZRPWhHsNHPggWR4XS5g82A1A=; b=WrCmcevbzE7HgiZ8thbdqUPK1p jCodtCebSCwb0fju452gYR+f/K3Wknd4TpdkHytYxv2OyROHjC6Kl/QqjvAbIP0RIxd7AMJLvUG4R DnJwQG3JPFtxdZ+/fMFhN+WnSPj6zk1iJ4N5D5eqeNL/gp6nYJUhKN+bOfOIg4RSwQf2fvMuW53xm +2+JxS+krK6CdqMwIwuBuewB3T+PVDZxrX3K6OUNxSz19yhFtZc8kNp12Zbc2pWhwJ7181LcnV9il 3eVB3TkH4tYXj12GNXYsVln4EtOBNCIoy04XZdIg6OffdMMUsDcOzlIFiPG+cZP5suhLcdjicxrxu AeBgN9LQ==; Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" To: Nick Desaulniers Cc: Mark Rutland , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Catalin Marinas , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Will Deacon , Arnd Bergmann , Alan Stern , Sami Tolvanen , Matt Turner , kernel-team , Dave Martin , Marco Elver , Kees Cook , "Paul E. McKenney" , Boqun Feng , Josh Triplett , Steven Rostedt , Ivan Kokshaysky , Linux ARM , Richard Henderson , LKML , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 04:01:28PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > I'm trying to put together a Micro Conference for Linux Plumbers > conference focused on "make LLVM slightly less shitty." Do you all > plan on attending the conference? Would it be worthwhile to hold a > session focused on discussing this (LTO and memory models) be > worthwhile? I'd love to have a session about compilers and memory ordering with both GCC and CLANG in attendance. We need a solution for dependent-loads and control-dependencies for both toolchains.