From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] arm64: lto: Strengthen READ_ONCE() to acquire when CLANG_LTO=y Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 11:20:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20200708182036.GR9247@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> References: <20200701170722.4rte5ssnmrn2uqzg@bakewell.cambridge.arm.com> <20200702072301.GA15963@willie-the-truck> <20200706160023.GB10992@arm.com> <20200706163455.GV9247@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20200706170556.GE10992@arm.com> <20200706173628.GZ9247@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20200707102915.GI10992@arm.com> <20200707225122.GJ9247@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20200708091620.GF597537@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1594232436; bh=TonelHlHtWDNOIWLPcZdK8GZofB+N27b/F2Vm9vTRh8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ukj3cLrdjnebjlAukmmTASRyw1pa2gMozxAYVE8k3Aal5uTo6H7tEBiy5eJN+QxXL gRJwrI65r1HmPmI3ecywXxV/5VkFMVuEu4tbgwYCZmqCvbTsSU6mGg/xNvJwWULf34 9NfF2Ngood+DO+fV+U5vOrrqOFGolG0eKpdqBV2Q= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200708091620.GF597537@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-alpha-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Nick Desaulniers , Dave Martin , Will Deacon , Sami Tolvanen , Marco Elver , Mark Rutland , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Catalin Marinas , Jason Wang , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Alan Stern , Matt Turner , kernel-team , Kees Cook , Arnd Bergmann , Boqun Feng , Josh Triplett , Ivan Kokshaysky , Linux ARM , Richard On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 11:16:20AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 04:01:28PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > I'm trying to put together a Micro Conference for Linux Plumbers > > conference focused on "make LLVM slightly less shitty." Do you all > > plan on attending the conference? Would it be worthwhile to hold a > > session focused on discussing this (LTO and memory models) be > > worthwhile? > > I'd love to have a session about compilers and memory ordering with both > GCC and CLANG in attendance. > > We need a solution for dependent-loads and control-dependencies for both > toolchains. What Peter said! ;-) Thanx, Paul