From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-mapping: introduce dma_get_seg_boundary_nr_pages() Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 18:12:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20200903161252.GA24841@lst.de> References: <20200901221646.26491-1-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> <20200901221646.26491-2-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Nicolin Chen , Christoph Hellwig , Stephen Rothwell , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , "open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC PA SEMI PWRFICIENT" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , rth@twiddle.net, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, Matt Turner , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, schnelle@linux.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 01:57:39PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > +{ > > + if (!dev) > > + return (U32_MAX >> page_shift) + 1; > > + return (dma_get_seg_boundary(dev) >> page_shift) + 1; > > Can it be better to do something like > unsigned long boundary = dev ? dma_get_seg_boundary(dev) : U32_MAX; > > return (boundary >> page_shift) + 1; > > ? I don't really see what that would buy us.