From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST] alpha: Replace bogus in_interrupt() Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 16:25:35 -0800 Message-ID: <20201113162535.92435b319c69b435f379ddbe@linux-foundation.org> References: <20201113135832.2202833-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1605313535; bh=G4wbIA6U5sagP0DSycw0J5zEgOwYyErMorMIAwSJync=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tJGU2tTaLn9JZy+bWM0x4SWs9lj6PBmf/6ZAv+XrsRnBj4Mgf/kaiIX5GJNDk72fd k0HiytGrsNE0Q54WcVQ1Wnb544RLgEv9SA/sQdYzV8iJq9Va5QodhRYtWa0pj5/bdl xaTzz5flOGYyGiIDKds4p/eQojRay2m2z0UhSva0= In-Reply-To: <20201113135832.2202833-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Richard Henderson , Matt Turner , Ivan Kokshaysky On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 14:58:32 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > From: Thomas Gleixner > > in_interrupt() is true for a variety of things including bottom half > disabled regions. Deducing hard interrupt context from it is dubious at > best. > > Use in_irq() which is true if called in hard interrupt context. Otherwise > calling irq_exit() would do more harm than good. > Gee, how to test it. Does anyone run current kernels on alpha?