From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] ARM: disable CONFIG_IDE in footbridge_defconfig Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:18:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20210322151823.GA2764@lst.de> References: <20210318045706.200458-1-hch@lst.de> <20210318045706.200458-3-hch@lst.de> <20210319170753.GV1463@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20210319175311.GW1463@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20210322145403.GA30942@lst.de> <20210322151503.GX1463@shell.armlinux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210322151503.GX1463@shell.armlinux.org.uk> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane-mx.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: Jens Axboe , Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Ivan Kokshaysky , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , Matt Turner , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Richard Henderson On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:15:03PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > It gets worse than that though - due to a change to remove > pcibios_min_io from the generic code, moving it into the ARM > architecture code, this has caused a regression that prevents the > legacy resources being registered against the bus resource. So even > if they are there, they cause probe failures. I haven't found a > reasonable way to solve this yet, but until there is, there is no > way that the PATA driver can be used as the "legacy mode" support > is effectively done via the PCI code assigning virtual IO port > resources. > > I'm quite surprised that the CY82C693 even works on Alpha - I've > asked for a lspci for that last week but nothing has yet been > forthcoming from whoever responded to your patch for Alpha - so I > can't compare what I'm seeing with what's happening with Alpha. That sounds like something we could fix with a quirk for function 2 in the PCI resource assignment code. Can you show what vendor and device ID function 2 has so that I could try to come up with one?