From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from minute.unseen.parts (minute.unseen.parts [139.162.151.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D42C1AC891; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 09:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=139.162.151.61 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738143812; cv=none; b=goUaVKD/P0VRpQ0mhKsf8GUj08u8SO3HbNddMdCjPbjBWZ3F08c7fM0nflN4jTmO3JIclLhkCAS/Ml+aB/Se2rSt+NPuuVYz2eLXyKK82KMnwSNIh05qstxBlpIsKbC/0MKb1aaK39sgJDDbyx7U2lqZZnwsjGsditWs92zIA5s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738143812; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qzoLr0ct6q33rAXFtuGQuGtgiHWmFGbzIuZBxankviU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=pKl4siNJSQ27pyMNJh6HwX/L58HP5x3n6QqdK7Q1tJ0aM9pVtJwwbnzANDsPo7HUi7rwJVjpu3ciSc2F3yEXDPwAXmBYrix7/mxqhSGU+igXOW5w1xD+U4PEpbdDy1gzvrbmazCiQrw4WfhP1qdYbtdWVPGQKCh9LCUPZMGA14E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=unseen.parts; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=unseen.parts; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=unseen.parts header.i=@unseen.parts header.b=EvrbzFmd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=139.162.151.61 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=unseen.parts Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=unseen.parts Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=unseen.parts header.i=@unseen.parts header.b="EvrbzFmd" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=unseen.parts; s=sig; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Message-Id: Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ILyWo4WZKxrebO0o2L7sKDX0az7JI/FHb3DRx785Rgc=; b=EvrbzFmdBxQpMOuyvBBeN0Xfpd 9BpOavhs1Hg+2pcHevzD77VSklL4HCHFLNs09jc1Om31rRHui8/MBaUecJfpqsP56jVKze1hWrRvj r7BGfrE9GMVB81vrFTDN0G+eJKvJZcdfKwrRdqMUPVlY2+c5JmNDKWYqvXQXSgpwEKjX4qAJdNn2u DM/sCHHKwqDF8cbYGgxFv/A0QJQnbJirt74Kl1kIy7WCanQyjnIo+7Fr0C07/W5EB2Y5TcQ9WMz0/ e11utXfTRCdF+vASC2TPCnmI4qMP7xHVtU5yQuZgUqNF6XA8vvrbFLo/cGPh1z9hBnJy/06eeWofi MOkRJWVw==; Received: from ink by minute.unseen.parts with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1td4bI-000783-1C; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:43:12 +0100 From: Ivan Kokshaysky To: Richard Henderson , Matt Turner , Oleg Nesterov , Al Viro , Arnd Bergmann , "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Magnus Lindholm , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/4] alpha: stack fixes Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:43:08 +0100 Message-Id: <20250129094312.27399-1-ink@unseen.parts> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This series fixes oopses on Alpha/SMP observed since kernel v6.9. [1] Thanks to Magnus Lindholm for identifying that remarkably longstanding bug. The problem is that GCC expects 16-byte alignment of the incoming stack since early 2004, as Maciej found out [2]: Having actually dug speculatively I can see that the psABI was changed in GCC 3.5 with commit e5e10fb4a350 ("re PR target/14539 (128-bit long double improperly aligned)") back in Mar 2004, when the stack pointer alignment was increased from 8 bytes to 16 bytes, and arch/alpha/kernel/entry.S has various suspicious stack pointer adjustments, starting with SP_OFF which is not a whole multiple of 16. Also, as Magnus noted, "ALPHA Calling Standard" [3] required the same: D.3.1 Stack Alignment This standard requires that stacks be octaword aligned at the time a new procedure is invoked. However: - the "normal" kernel stack is always misaligned by 8 bytes, thanks to the odd number of 64-bit words in 'struct pt_regs', which is the very first thing pushed onto the kernel thread stack; - syscall, fault, interrupt etc. handlers may, or may not, receive aligned stack depending on numerous factors. Somehow we got away with it until recently, when we ended up with a stack corruption in kernel/smp.c:smp_call_function_single() due to its use of 32-byte aligned local data and the compiler doing clever things allocating it on the stack. Patches 1-2 are preparatory; 3 - the main fix; 4 - fixes remaining special cases. Ivan. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/CA+=Fv5R9NG+1SHU9QV9hjmavycHKpnNyerQ=Ei90G98ukRcRJA@mail.gmail.com/#r [2] https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/alpine.DEB.2.21.2501130248010.18889@angie.orcam.me.uk/ [3] https://bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/alpha/Alpha_Calling_Standard_Rev_2.0_19900427.pdf --- Ivan Kokshaysky (4): alpha/uapi: do not expose kernel-only stack frame structures alpha: replace hardcoded stack offsets with autogenerated ones alpha: make stack 16-byte aligned (most cases) alpha: align stack for page fault and user unaligned trap handlers arch/alpha/include/asm/ptrace.h | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 66 +--------------------------- arch/alpha/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 4 ++ arch/alpha/kernel/entry.S | 24 +++++----- arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c | 2 +- arch/alpha/mm/fault.c | 4 +- 6 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) -- 2.39.5