From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Magnus Lindholm <linmag7@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/9] sparc64: Use physical address DMA mapping
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2025 12:16:03 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251003151603.GD3360665@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bac909dab3c82fc6a7a4f5a31f22bac9a69f7f07.1759071169.git.leon@kernel.org>
On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 06:02:25PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> @@ -273,13 +272,16 @@ static dma_addr_t dma_4u_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
> u32 bus_addr, ret;
> unsigned long iopte_protection;
>
> + if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_MMIO)
> + goto bad_no_ctx;
> +
> iommu = dev->archdata.iommu;
> strbuf = dev->archdata.stc;
>
> if (unlikely(direction == DMA_NONE))
> goto bad_no_ctx;
>
> - oaddr = (unsigned long)(page_address(page) + offset);
> + oaddr = (unsigned long)(phys_to_virt(phys));
> npages = IO_PAGE_ALIGN(oaddr + sz) - (oaddr & IO_PAGE_MASK);
> npages >>= IO_PAGE_SHIFT;
This should be cleaned up some more:
oaddr = (unsigned long)(page_address(page) + offset);
ret = bus_addr | (oaddr & ~IO_PAGE_MASK);
base_paddr = __pa(oaddr & IO_PAGE_MASK);
Makes no sense to phys_to_virt() then __pa() on that result. Drop oaddr.
Then I would copy and paste the comment from mips about DMA_ATTR_MMIO
> @@ -367,13 +366,16 @@ static dma_addr_t dma_4v_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
> dma_addr_t bus_addr, ret;
> long entry;
>
> + if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_MMIO)
> + goto bad;
> +
> iommu = dev->archdata.iommu;
> atu = iommu->atu;
>
> if (unlikely(direction == DMA_NONE))
> goto bad;
>
> - oaddr = (unsigned long)(page_address(page) + offset);
> + oaddr = (unsigned long)(phys_to_virt(phys));
> npages = IO_PAGE_ALIGN(oaddr + sz) - (oaddr & IO_PAGE_MASK);
> npages >>= IO_PAGE_SHIFT;
Same remarks here
> +static dma_addr_t iounit_map_phys(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys,
> + size_t len, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
> {
> - void *vaddr = page_address(page) + offset;
> + void *vaddr = phys_to_virt(phys);
> struct iounit_struct *iounit = dev->archdata.iommu;
> unsigned long ret, flags;
iounit_get_area() does not seem to need vaddr:
npages = ((vaddr & ~PAGE_MASK) + size + (PAGE_SIZE-1)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
~PAGE_MASK is page_offset()
iopte = MKIOPTE(__pa(vaddr & PAGE_MASK));
__pa(phys_to_virt(pa)) again:
iopte = MKIOPTE(PAGE_ALIGN(pa));
vaddr = IOUNIT_DMA_BASE + (scan << PAGE_SHIFT) + (vaddr & ~PAGE_MASK);
page_offset, then it replaces vaddr.
So I'd tidy this too.
> @@ -202,10 +204,10 @@ static dma_addr_t __sbus_iommu_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
> * We expect unmapped highmem pages to be not in the cache.
> * XXX Is this a good assumption?
> * XXX What if someone else unmaps it here and races us?
> */
At least ARM32 has code that seems to say these assumptions are not
always true.. Oh well.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-03 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-28 15:02 [PATCH v1 0/9] Remove DMA .map_page and .unmap_page callbacks Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-28 15:02 ` [PATCH v1 1/9] alpha: Convert mapping routine to rely on physical address Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-28 17:35 ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-10-03 14:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-28 15:02 ` [PATCH v1 2/9] MIPS/jazzdma: Provide physical address directly Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-03 14:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-28 15:02 ` [PATCH v1 3/9] parisc: Convert DMA map_page to map_phys interface Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-03 15:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-03 17:18 ` John David Anglin
2025-10-03 17:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-03 20:28 ` John David Anglin
2025-10-05 14:29 ` James Bottomley
2025-10-05 13:22 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-05 23:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-06 4:03 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-05 14:22 ` James Bottomley
2025-09-28 15:02 ` [PATCH v1 4/9] powerpc: Convert to physical address DMA mapping Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-03 16:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-04 6:19 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-10-04 20:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-28 15:02 ` [PATCH v1 5/9] sparc64: Use " Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-03 15:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-09-28 15:02 ` [PATCH v1 6/9] x86: Use physical address for " Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-03 15:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-28 15:02 ` [PATCH v1 7/9] vdpa: Convert to physical address " Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-03 15:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-28 15:02 ` [PATCH v1 8/9] xen: swiotlb: Convert mapping routine to rely on physical address Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-03 16:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-28 15:02 ` [PATCH v1 9/9] dma-mapping: remove unused map_page callback Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-28 15:17 ` Sam Ravnborg
2025-09-28 15:20 ` Sam Ravnborg
2025-09-28 15:31 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-28 15:28 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-03 16:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251003151603.GD3360665@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=geoff@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linmag7@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).