From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: <oleg@redhat.com>, <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
<mattst88@gmail.com>, <linmag7@gmail.com>,
<linux@armlinux.org.uk>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
<will@kernel.org>, <kees@kernel.org>, <guoren@kernel.org>,
<chenhuacai@kernel.org>, <kernel@xen0n.name>,
<geert@linux-m68k.org>, <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
<James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>, <deller@gmx.de>,
<maddy@linux.ibm.com>, <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, <npiggin@gmail.com>,
<chleroy@kernel.org>, <pjw@kernel.org>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
<aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, <alex@ghiti.fr>, <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
<gor@linux.ibm.com>, <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
<borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>, <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
<ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>, <dalias@libc.org>,
<glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>, <richard@nod.at>,
<anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>, <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
<luto@kernel.org>, <tglx@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<bp@alien8.de>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<chris@zankel.net>, <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<wad@chromium.org>, <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>, <thuth@redhat.com>,
<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>,
<kevin.brodsky@arm.com>, <linusw@kernel.org>,
<yeoreum.yun@arm.com>, <song@kernel.org>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
<anshuman.khandual@arm.com>, <broonie@kernel.org>,
<liqiang01@kylinos.cn>, <pengcan@kylinos.cn>,
<ryan.roberts@arm.com>, <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>,
<sshegde@linux.ibm.com>, <mchauras@linux.ibm.com>,
<austin.kim@lge.com>, <jchrist@linux.ibm.com>, <arnd@arndb.de>,
<thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>, <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
<andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, <jgross@suse.com>, <kas@kernel.org>,
<x86@kernel.org>, <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-csky@vger.kernel.org>, <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>, <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v16 01/18] seccomp: Convert __secure_computing() to return boolean
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 21:05:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260629130616.642022-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629130616.642022-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
The return value of __secure_computing() currently uses 0 to indicate
that a system call should be allowed, and -1 to indicate that it should
be blocked/killed. This 0/-1 pattern is non-intuitive for a security
check function and makes the control flow at the call sites less readable.
Furthermore, any potential future changes to these return values would
require a high-risk, error-prone audit of all its users across different
architectures.
Sanitize this logic by converting the return type of __secure_computing()
to a proper boolean, where 'true' explicitly means 'allow' and 'false'
means 'fail/deny'.
Update all the two dozen or so call sites across the tree to align with
this new boolean semantic. No functional changes are intended, as the
callers still return -1 to the lower-level assembly entry code upon
seccomp denial.
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
---
arch/alpha/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
arch/csky/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
arch/m68k/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
arch/sh/kernel/ptrace_32.c | 2 +-
arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c | 2 +-
arch/xtensa/kernel/ptrace.c | 3 +--
include/linux/entry-common.h | 7 +++---
include/linux/seccomp.h | 10 ++++----
kernel/seccomp.c | 34 +++++++++++++--------------
14 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/ptrace.c
index 0687760ea466..27d9847b1082 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ asmlinkage unsigned long syscall_trace_enter(void)
* If this fails, seccomp may already have set up the return value
* (e.g. SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO / TRACE).
*/
- if (secure_computing() == -1) {
+ if (!secure_computing()) {
if (regs->r19 == 0 && regs->r0 == (unsigned long)-1)
syscall_set_return_value(current, regs, -ENOSYS, 0);
syscall_set_nr(current, regs, -1);
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
index 7951b2c06fec..5210745725ca 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ asmlinkage int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
/* Do seccomp after ptrace; syscall may have changed. */
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
- if (secure_computing() == -1)
+ if (!secure_computing())
return -1;
#else
/* XXX: remove this once OABI gets fixed */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
index 4d08598e2891..2ca6fab39a37 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -2420,7 +2420,7 @@ int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
}
/* Do the secure computing after ptrace; failures should be fast. */
- if (secure_computing() == -1)
+ if (!secure_computing())
return NO_SYSCALL;
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT))
diff --git a/arch/csky/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/csky/kernel/ptrace.c
index 6bb685a2646b..11c5eff41e9d 100644
--- a/arch/csky/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/csky/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ asmlinkage int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
if (ptrace_report_syscall_entry(regs))
return -1;
- if (secure_computing() == -1)
+ if (!secure_computing())
return -1;
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT))
diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/ptrace.c
index cfa2df24eced..d2411404b9df 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ asmlinkage int syscall_trace_enter(void)
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE))
ret = ptrace_report_syscall_entry(task_pt_regs(current));
- if (secure_computing() == -1)
+ if (!secure_computing())
return -1;
return ret;
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c
index 3f4c94c88124..0d809cda7542 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -1328,7 +1328,7 @@ asmlinkage long syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
return -1;
}
- if (secure_computing())
+ if (!secure_computing())
return -1;
if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)))
diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c
index 8a17ab7e6e0b..565b51a48c8a 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
}
/* Do the secure computing check after ptrace. */
- if (secure_computing() == -1)
+ if (!secure_computing())
return -1;
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/ptrace_32.c b/arch/sh/kernel/ptrace_32.c
index 06f765d71a29..8687f17cbe5a 100644
--- a/arch/sh/kernel/ptrace_32.c
+++ b/arch/sh/kernel/ptrace_32.c
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ asmlinkage long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
return -1;
}
- if (secure_computing() == -1)
+ if (!secure_computing())
return -1;
if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)))
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c b/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
index ba7494f9bfe4..916cd7acceaf 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ void handle_syscall(struct uml_pt_regs *r)
goto out;
/* Do the seccomp check after ptrace; failures should be fast. */
- if (secure_computing() == -1)
+ if (!secure_computing())
goto out;
syscall = UPT_SYSCALL_NR(r);
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c
index ea36de9fa864..6aed3987b9f9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static bool __emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
regs->orig_ax = syscall_nr;
regs->ax = -ENOSYS;
tmp = secure_computing();
- if ((!tmp && regs->orig_ax != syscall_nr) || regs->ip != address) {
+ if ((tmp && regs->orig_ax != syscall_nr) || regs->ip != address) {
warn_bad_vsyscall(KERN_DEBUG, regs,
"seccomp tried to change syscall nr or ip");
force_exit_sig(SIGSYS);
diff --git a/arch/xtensa/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/xtensa/kernel/ptrace.c
index b80d54b2ea34..ef78fcd318ff 100644
--- a/arch/xtensa/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/xtensa/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -553,8 +553,7 @@ int do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
return 0;
}
- if (regs->syscall == NO_SYSCALL ||
- secure_computing() == -1) {
+ if (regs->syscall == NO_SYSCALL || !secure_computing()) {
do_syscall_trace_leave(regs);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/entry-common.h b/include/linux/entry-common.h
index 416a3352261f..3f66320e46d3 100644
--- a/include/linux/entry-common.h
+++ b/include/linux/entry-common.h
@@ -100,9 +100,8 @@ static __always_inline long syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned l
/* Do seccomp after ptrace, to catch any tracer changes. */
if (work & SYSCALL_WORK_SECCOMP) {
- ret = __secure_computing();
- if (ret == -1L)
- return ret;
+ if (!__secure_computing())
+ return -1L;
}
/* Either of the above might have changed the syscall number */
@@ -113,7 +112,7 @@ static __always_inline long syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned l
syscall_enter_audit(regs, syscall);
- return ret ? : syscall;
+ return syscall;
}
/**
diff --git a/include/linux/seccomp.h b/include/linux/seccomp.h
index 9b959972bf4a..7af3173f40e9 100644
--- a/include/linux/seccomp.h
+++ b/include/linux/seccomp.h
@@ -22,14 +22,14 @@
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <asm/seccomp.h>
-extern int __secure_computing(void);
+extern bool __secure_computing(void);
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
-static inline int secure_computing(void)
+static inline bool secure_computing(void)
{
if (unlikely(test_syscall_work(SECCOMP)))
return __secure_computing();
- return 0;
+ return true;
}
#else
extern void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall);
@@ -50,11 +50,11 @@ static inline int seccomp_mode(struct seccomp *s)
struct seccomp_data;
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
-static inline int secure_computing(void) { return 0; }
+static inline bool secure_computing(void) { return true; }
#else
static inline void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall) { return; }
#endif
-static inline int __secure_computing(void) { return 0; }
+static inline bool __secure_computing(void) { return true; }
static inline long prctl_get_seccomp(void)
{
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index 066909393c38..1fec6efedab6 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -1100,12 +1100,12 @@ void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall)
else
BUG();
}
-int __secure_computing(void)
+bool __secure_computing(void)
{
int this_syscall = syscall_get_nr(current, current_pt_regs());
secure_computing_strict(this_syscall);
- return 0;
+ return true;
}
#else
@@ -1256,7 +1256,7 @@ static int seccomp_do_user_notification(int this_syscall,
return -1;
}
-static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
+static bool __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
{
u32 filter_ret, action;
struct seccomp_data sd;
@@ -1294,7 +1294,7 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
case SECCOMP_RET_TRACE:
/* We've been put in this state by the ptracer already. */
if (recheck_after_trace)
- return 0;
+ return true;
/* ENOSYS these calls if there is no tracer attached. */
if (!ptrace_event_enabled(current, PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP)) {
@@ -1330,19 +1330,19 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
* a skip would have already been reported.
*/
if (__seccomp_filter(this_syscall, true))
- return -1;
+ return false;
- return 0;
+ return true;
case SECCOMP_RET_USER_NOTIF:
if (seccomp_do_user_notification(this_syscall, match, &sd))
goto skip;
- return 0;
+ return true;
case SECCOMP_RET_LOG:
seccomp_log(this_syscall, 0, action, true);
- return 0;
+ return true;
case SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW:
/*
@@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
* this action since SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW is the starting
* state in seccomp_run_filters().
*/
- return 0;
+ return true;
case SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD:
case SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS:
@@ -1367,46 +1367,46 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
} else {
do_exit(SIGSYS);
}
- return -1; /* skip the syscall go directly to signal handling */
+ return false; /* skip the syscall go directly to signal handling */
}
unreachable();
skip:
seccomp_log(this_syscall, 0, action, match ? match->log : false);
- return -1;
+ return false;
}
#else
-static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
+static bool __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const bool recheck_after_trace)
{
BUG();
- return -1;
+ return false;
}
#endif
-int __secure_computing(void)
+bool __secure_computing(void)
{
int mode = current->seccomp.mode;
int this_syscall;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE) &&
unlikely(current->ptrace & PT_SUSPEND_SECCOMP))
- return 0;
+ return true;
this_syscall = syscall_get_nr(current, current_pt_regs());
switch (mode) {
case SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT:
__secure_computing_strict(this_syscall); /* may call do_exit */
- return 0;
+ return true;
case SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER:
return __seccomp_filter(this_syscall, false);
/* Surviving SECCOMP_RET_KILL_* must be proactively impossible. */
case SECCOMP_MODE_DEAD:
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
do_exit(SIGKILL);
- return -1;
+ return false;
default:
BUG();
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-29 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 13:05 [PATCH v16 00/18] arm64: entry: Convert to Generic Entry Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-29 13:05 ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2026-06-30 16:37 ` [PATCH v16 01/18] seccomp: Convert __secure_computing() to return boolean Ada Couprie Diaz
2026-07-06 2:41 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-03 7:51 ` Michal Suchánek
2026-07-03 9:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-03 10:00 ` Mark Rutland
2026-07-03 10:27 ` Michal Suchánek
2026-07-03 11:59 ` Kevin Brodsky
2026-07-03 20:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-03 21:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-07-03 21:32 ` Linus Walleij
2026-06-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v16 02/18] syscall_user_dispatch: Introduce a weak fallback for arch_syscall_is_vdso_sigreturn() Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-03 11:13 ` Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
2026-07-03 11:43 ` Mark Rutland
2026-07-09 6:30 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v16 03/18] arm64: ptrace: Pass thread flags to syscall_trace_enter/exit() Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v16 04/18] arm64: ptrace: Use syscall_get_nr() helper for syscall_trace_enter() Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v16 05/18] arm64: ptrace: Expand secure_computing() in place Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v16 06/18] arm64: ptrace: Use syscall_get_arguments() helper for audit Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v16 07/18] arm64: ptrace: Protect rseq_syscall() from tracer PC modifications Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v16 08/18] arm64: ptrace: Rename syscall_trace_exit() to syscall_exit_work() Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v16 09/18] arm64: syscall: Rework the syscall exit path in el0_svc_common() Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v16 10/18] arm64: ptrace: Extract syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work() helper Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v16 11/18] arm64: ptrace: Align syscall exit work semantics with generic entry Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v16 12/18] arm64: syscall: Use exit-specific flags check in el0_svc_common() Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v16 13/18] arm64: syscall: Simplify el0_svc_common() syscall exit path Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v16 14/18] arm64: syscall: Simplify syscall exit path in el0_svc_common() Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v16 15/18] arm64: ptrace: Skip syscall exit reporting for PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v16 16/18] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v16 17/18] arm64: Inline el0_svc_common() Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-29 13:06 ` [PATCH v16 18/18] arm64: vdso: Expose sigreturn address on vdso to the kernel Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-30 15:32 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-07-09 6:37 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 7:17 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2026-07-09 8:15 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-07-09 8:27 ` Thomas Weißschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260629130616.642022-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=austin.kim@lge.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jchrist@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linmag7@gmail.com \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=liqiang01@kylinos.cn \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=mchauras@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pengcan@kylinos.cn \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox