From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: Arches that don't support PREEMPT
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 19:58:31 +0200
Message-ID: <64746d98b60f1677cecd26501511f140688801e1.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
References: <87zg1u1h5t.fsf@oracle.com>
         <CAHk-=whMkp68vNxVn1H3qe_P7n=X2sWPL9kvW22dsvMFH8FcQQ@mail.gmail.com>
         <20230911150410.GC9098@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
         <87h6o01w1a.fsf@oracle.com>
         <20230912082606.GB35261@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
         <87cyyfxd4k.ffs@tglx>
         <CAHk-=whnwC01m_1f-gaM1xbvvwzwTiKitrWniA-ChZv+bM03dg@mail.gmail.com>
         <87led2wdj0.ffs@tglx> <ZQmbhoQIINs8rLHp@casper.infradead.org>
         <0e69f7df80dc5878071deb0d80938138d19de1d1.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
         <20230919134218.GA39281@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
         <a6c84803274116ec827cd4bdd4e72a8d0c304c27.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
         <CAHk-=wgUimqtF7PqFfRw4Ju5H1KYkp6+8F=hBz7amGQ8GaGKkA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Return-path: <linux-hexagon-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgUimqtF7PqFfRw4Ju5H1KYkp6+8F=hBz7amGQ8GaGKkA@mail.gmail.com>
List-ID: <linux-alpha.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, luto@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, mgorman@suse.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, jon.grimm@amd.com, bharata@amd.com, raghavendra.kt@amd.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipso>

Hi Linus!

On Tue, 2023-09-19 at 10:25 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sept 2023 at 06:48, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> > 
> > As Geert poined out, I'm not seeing anything particular problematic with the
> > architectures lacking CONFIG_PREEMPT at the moment. This seems to be more
> > something about organizing KConfig files.
> 
> It can definitely be problematic.
> 
> Not the Kconfig file part, and not the preempt count part itself.
> 
> But the fact that it has never been used and tested means that there
> might be tons of "this architecture code knows it's not preemptible,
> because this architecture doesn't support preemption".
> 
> So you may have basic architecture code that simply doesn't have the
> "preempt_disable()/enable()" pairs that it needs.
> 
> PeterZ mentioned the generic entry code, which does this for the entry
> path. But it actually goes much deeper: just do a
> 
>     git grep preempt_disable arch/x86/kernel
> 
> and then do the same for some other architectures.
> 
> Looking at alpha, for example, there *are* hits for it, so at least
> some of the code there clearly *tries* to do it. But does it cover all
> the required parts? If it's never been tested, I'd be surprised if
> it's all just ready to go.

Thanks for the detailed explanation.

> I do think we'd need to basically continue to support ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
> - and such architectures migth end up with the worst-cast latencies of
> only scheduling at return to user space.

Great to hear, thank you.

And, yes, eventually I would be happy to help get alpha and m68k converted.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913