From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Schmitz Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Refactoring exit Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:59:51 +1200 Message-ID: <6e283d24-7121-ae7c-d5ad-558f85858a09@gmail.com> References: <87a6njf0ia.fsf@disp2133> <87tulpbp19.fsf@disp2133> <87zgvgabw1.fsf@disp2133> <875yy3850g.fsf_-_@disp2133> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=oObwvXsaqAUb8vB6GzYedHdtF/WzC8DIfOegRYh4rG0=; b=JDL39NDUlYiMBJb05P0yCWBqka4BZu9M034XP0rS24lT7mC1/+6Bw7ZJXTU+AG6o8M RNaOpJ1TaN1Cw7Xa+URDriIEFX6eK3YfA4pRlrQKAf7FcAPbE6QVbcrZdf112ya9IfIR 9A0jlmgONyxJgsH19758eWPXScyJCCK7nQ5UJXXw6LSFD4SlpY5NZDwjwkbiylTmOUKl 95+ELqsdWyUdc+A9eQ61PlfMibeJELEdciMmKIJ2QPBvZ/H+F+s73NQcvdmkoZEjpSbj qJr//yVEMeRnbrzxKzZIxksmMkz4doZDdDWS5Qt/QJMxanzgZVtvjHRpfzH+m+J3T/yx S6pg== In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" To: Al Viro , "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-arch , Jens Axboe , Oleg Nesterov , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Richard Henderson , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , alpha , Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-m68k , Arnd Bergmann , Tejun Heo , Kees Cook On 28/06/21 10:13 am, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 10:45:23PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > >> 13) there's bdflush(1, whatever), which is equivalent to exit(0). >> IMO it's long past the time to simply remove the sucker. > Incidentally, calling that from ptraced process on alpha leads to > the same headache for tracer. _If_ we leave it around, this is > another candidate for "hit yourself with that special signal" - > both alpha and m68k have that syscall, and IMO adding an asm > wrapper for that one is over the top. > > Said that, we really ought to bury that thing: > > commit 2f268ee88abb33968501a44368db55c63adaad40 > Author: Andrew Morton > Date: Sat Dec 14 03:16:29 2002 -0800 > > [PATCH] deprecate use of bdflush() > > Patch from Robert Love > > We can never get rid of it if we do not deprecate it - so do so and > print a stern warning to those who still run bdflush daemons. > > Deprecated for 18.5 years by now - I seriously suspect that we have > some contributors younger than that... Haven't found that warning in over 7 years' worth of console logs, and I'm a good candidate for running the oldest userland in existence for m68k. Time to let it go. Cheers,     Michael