From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] Introduce __xchg, non-atomic xchg Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 15:12:19 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20221222114635.1251934-1-andrzej.hajda@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20221222114635.1251934-1-andrzej.hajda@intel.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andrzej Hajda Cc: Mark Rutland , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, Boqun Feng , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Arnd Bergmann , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, Rodrigo Vivi , Andy Shevchenko , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Hi Andrzej, Thanks for your series! On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 12:49 PM Andrzej Hajda wrote: > I hope there will be place for such tiny helper in kernel. > Quick cocci analyze shows there is probably few thousands places > where it could be useful. > I am not sure who is good person to review/ack such patches, > so I've used my intuition to construct to/cc lists, sorry for mistakes. > This is the 2nd approach of the same idea, with comments addressed[0]. > > The helper is tiny and there are advices we can leave without it, so > I want to present few arguments why it would be good to have it: > > 1. Code readability/simplification/number of lines: > > Real example from drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/esw/qos.c: > - previous_min_rate = evport->qos.min_rate; > - evport->qos.min_rate = min_rate; > + previous_min_rate = __xchg(evport->qos.min_rate, min_rate); Upon closer look, shouldn't that be previous_min_rate = __xchg(&evport->qos.min_rate, min_rate); ? > For sure the code is more compact, and IMHO more readable. > > 2. Presence of similar helpers in other somehow related languages/libs: > > a) Rust[1]: 'replace' from std::mem module, there is also 'take' > helper (__xchg(&x, 0)), which is the same as private helper in > i915 - fetch_and_zero, see latest patch. > b) C++ [2]: 'exchange' from utility header. > > If the idea is OK there are still 2 qestions to answer: > > 1. Name of the helper, __xchg follows kernel conventions, > but for me Rust names are also OK. Before I realized the missing "&", I wondered how this is different from swap(), so naming is important. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/minmax.h#L139 Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds