From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nicholas Piggin" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Implement MMU_LAZY_TLB_SHOOTDOWN for alpha Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 11:45:50 +1000 Message-ID: References: <20230524171822.177133-1-npiggin@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1685324757; x=1687916757; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=FQkbWL+3Ev4nMwJJ7UFzRpYF9hOTVDMnYEMUVrkmMnA=; b=MKKjYM3tC123uLigsG3vu+S+cjQhXdJbyj4SpSUD5oihrc9ak7SDpxWYAtxPDjJoMo SW868iZGKqAaFcJRtqdw5L/sjvJ8NX7P4FNh8o1iCRzrhJnLquhuXUZY00Mh2gq2T8ht J7Aj/GeBFoK/HOFOcap947xleDFz6P2yOJ9q/NHYkDt3FRomuQCoDnbmuvqjMfU053Ge fT9GmacYaS+4q/JZ8ajbkZ8YNZg0yQpl52CvdTM79vLDdtWjHoW0jCKjLb7dfbm37pAg 5qaexZt2kQapDkItpl2olrZymiPJ3hXzps98r2/jeB7Fcdpk/uhErlzNLjtcpxLsMNIe 1CHw== In-Reply-To: List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: Matt Turner , Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Richard Henderson , Ivan Kokshaysky On Thu May 25, 2023 at 3:52 AM AEST, Matt Turner wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 1:28=E2=80=AFPM Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 10:18=E2=80=AFAM Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > > > > > Any thoughts about the series would be interesting to hear. > > > > Well, alpha is in a deathmatch with ia64 on "least relevant > > architecture ever, and next to be removed". > > > > There are no winners in that match. Except that I don't get yelled at by so many people when things break. Why do you think I work on powerpc? (/s, kind of). At least it's a reference, hopefully we can get a bit more interest. If we get a few converted then we could find some common patterns and pull them into generic code or at least a simpler recipe as we try to convert everything and just make this the only way it's implemented. Of course we need the big archs on board at some point. > > I still have the alpha architecture manual somewhere here, but I > > haven't touched any actual hardware in decades. > > > > But I certainly don't see anything _wrong_ with your series from a > > quick read-through. It would be nice to hear that it works on real > > hardware, of course, but from previous attempts, there's only a couple > > of people that still occasionally run it. > > I'll be happy to test. Thanks Matt, I'll put a git tree up and ping you. Thanks, Nick