From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/36] cpuidle: Fix rcu_idle_*() usage
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 13:41:13 +0100
Message-ID: <YqiB6YpVqq4wuDtO@FVFF77S0Q05N>
References: <20220608142723.103523089@infradead.org>
 <20220608144516.808451191@infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220608144516.808451191@infradead.org>
List-Id: <linux-alpha.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/virtualization>, 
 <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/>
List-Post: <mailto:virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>, 
 <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
Sender: "Virtualization" <virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com, rafael@kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, bsegall@google.com, guoren@kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, chenhuacai@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, agross@kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, linux-imx@nxp.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, mattst88@gmail.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, sammy@sammy.net, pmladek@suse.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, acme@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rth@twiddle.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org, svens@linux.ibm.com, jolsa@kernel.org, paul

On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 04:27:37PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> @@ -622,9 +622,13 @@ struct cpumask *tick_get_broadcast_onesh
>   * to avoid a deep idle transition as we are about to get the
>   * broadcast IPI right away.
>   */
> -int tick_check_broadcast_expired(void)
> +noinstr int tick_check_broadcast_expired(void)
>  {
> +#ifdef _ASM_GENERIC_BITOPS_INSTRUMENTED_NON_ATOMIC_H
> +	return arch_test_bit(smp_processor_id(), cpumask_bits(tick_broadcast_force_mask));
> +#else
>  	return cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), tick_broadcast_force_mask);
> +#endif
>  }

This is somewhat not-ideal. :/

Could we unconditionally do the arch_test_bit() variant, with a comment, or
does that not exist in some cases?

Thanks,
Mark.