From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from minute.unseen.parts (minute.unseen.parts [139.162.151.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E9051E4113; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 13:39:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=139.162.151.61 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737466785; cv=none; b=fjuWHBsmcsYDUUtJQWn5PTOcxT3OB8TsshkjzWDz47zM4hXqxwmWZmAS9n1ljJILEI1pUKmh8v95lRyFMrGFHssTq1+X7WiT+K6ilBfudVxa/j4Ym/rSLN548N3N6CKGqGu45StxSUHA24FkemH+gM+1JbWbmxW3dZ7nix0E6TY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737466785; c=relaxed/simple; bh=P/rdejKtkGF7phqCOM1uX7H/szH93gaF6eitNY7+Nl8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KdHbUkMshGf9ZvCykK+4NkUef/ZFxtuh4IE6dOL+m/cLWKb2QNMOnAFhAAL5G9NiGah2UpkWjpB2DTzOhWZuHBZTNNcQWQy66WlfKA4NrdLzHrYZZnYpX8Vxy7hl09QangKYtL6pOGoTZzQjZ0TXAXwJjzLlNQBMyQtZpJyINEc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=unseen.parts; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=unseen.parts; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=unseen.parts header.i=@unseen.parts header.b=PL7Pk3OK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=139.162.151.61 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=unseen.parts Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=unseen.parts Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=unseen.parts header.i=@unseen.parts header.b="PL7Pk3OK" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=unseen.parts; s=sig; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=yazK1+ptatThFrK4cT6AJGjYa0I7KYWYmu0jGBS9ews=; b=PL7Pk3OK72VyUslTKuVwbvRL4v 1FB7WXS8NCFgOADlGDdPvSCF1M7960sX6m2/HkUHQS70KS54dKYQVj3DrdfCX+PCB4uBB8BCtHifO aBcydd4sGwDjtX78CC+7FFv9Bir5aruxG2wdn5fHE2GPWKy5K138bOoqIEzJ9BV+9mp4jqOB1od/a f4dnxqF1dNUrrv8ug5Ir2P0QFDYfv1lHB0AgUcH30i6zC9h6CR2Srs9q2caG3g2u2nYuIlC8/atNQ OqaquNQie/M6UFjNIkdbC6hmphhYcH+VCp1T68sfuzBJoqWxZTjAddwx+yskdGdkdsee5+SY8B2yF gjQCtiaA==; Received: from minute.unseen.parts ([139.162.151.61]:53062 helo=minute) by minute.unseen.parts with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1taETK-00027I-1u; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 14:39:14 +0100 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 14:39:12 +0100 From: Ivan Kokshaysky To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Magnus Lindholm , "Paul E. McKenney" , Michael Cree , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel Oops on alpha with kernel version >=6.9.x Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 01:19:23PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jan 2025, Magnus Lindholm wrote: > > > 8-byte aligned. A quick-fix/workaround for this might be to avoid > > using the __attribute__((__aligned__(x))) directive on > > variables/structs declared on the stack in the kernel code (at least > > for alpha), but to really get to the bottom of this, the kernel needs > > to be fixed so that the kernel stack is in fact always 16-byte aligned > > on alpha. This means that this bug is not really related to rcu or smp > > but rather a mismatch between gcc and linux-alpha regarding psABI > > compliance. > > Correct. Unless someone beats me to it, I'll work on a fix, but I'm busy > with other stuff right now, so it may take a few weeks. I'll look into that (I owe you for helping me with the binutils patch :) Indeed, SP_OFF in entry.S is the main suspect at the moment. Ivan.