linux-alpha.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm/alloc_tag: add the CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU macro when statically defining the percpu variable _shared_alloc_tag
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 11:57:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEqWjSSLB3TPt9CH@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adcd63180c9492361d929019c60ffa942255988a.1749715979.git.gehao@kylinos.cn>

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 04:27:30PM +0800, Hao Ge wrote:
> From: Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
> 
> Recently discovered this entry while checking kallsyms on ARM64:
> ffff800083e509c0 D _shared_alloc_tag
> 
> If CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU is not defined(it is only defined for
> s390 and alpha architectures),there's no need to statically define
> the percpu variable _shared_alloc_tag. As the number of CPUs
> increases,the wasted memory will grow correspondingly.
> 
> Enclose the definition of _shared_alloc_tag within the
> CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU condition.
> 
> Suggested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  lib/alloc_tag.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/alloc_tag.c b/lib/alloc_tag.c
> index c7f602fa7b23..14fd66f26e42 100644
> --- a/lib/alloc_tag.c
> +++ b/lib/alloc_tag.c
> @@ -24,8 +24,10 @@ static bool mem_profiling_support;
>  
>  static struct codetag_type *alloc_tag_cttype;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU

It should be enough to add #ifdef ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU here instead of
all the churn.

>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct alloc_tag_counters, _shared_alloc_tag);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(_shared_alloc_tag);
> +#endif
>  
>  DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE(CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT,
>  			mem_alloc_profiling_key);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-12  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-12  8:27 [PATCH 0/5] mm: Restrict the static definition of the per-CPU variable _shared_alloc_tag to s390 and alpha architectures only Hao Ge
2025-06-12  8:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm/Kconfig: add ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU option Hao Ge
2025-06-12  8:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] alpha: Modify the definition logic of WEAK_PER_CPU Hao Ge
2025-06-12 11:22   ` Heiko Carstens
2025-06-12 12:06     ` Hao Ge
2025-06-12 12:15       ` Heiko Carstens
2025-06-12  8:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] s390: " Hao Ge
2025-06-12  8:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: use MODULE_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU instead of ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU Hao Ge
2025-06-12  8:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/alloc_tag: add the CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU macro when statically defining the percpu variable _shared_alloc_tag Hao Ge
2025-06-12  8:57   ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-06-12 11:24     ` Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aEqWjSSLB3TPt9CH@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=gehao@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hao.ge@linux.dev \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).