From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/15] pci: Consolidate pci_iomap* and pci_iomap*wc Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 15:11:39 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20210812194330.GA2500473@bjorn-Precision-5520> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20210812194330.GA2500473@bjorn-Precision-5520> Content-Language: en-US List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Bjorn Helgaas , Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra , Andy Lutomirski , Bjorn Helgaas , Richard Henderson , Thomas Bogendoerfer , James E J Bottomley , Helge Deller , "David S . Miller" , Arnd Bergmann , Jonathan Corbet , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Peter H Anvin , Dave Hansen , Tony Luck , Dan Williams , Kirill Shutemov , Sean Christopherson > Why is it safe to make pci_iomap_wc_range() support IO ports when it > didn't before? That might be desirable, but I think it *is* a > functional change here. None of the callers use it to map IO ports, so it will be a no-op for them. But you're right, it's a (minor) functional change. -Andi