From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wfout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C209D140366; Mon, 6 May 2024 10:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.123.146 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714990294; cv=none; b=kFIburJrWpe+3/CGOXJWZN0YI+zXyuCbvaK3w6MSWntrXRlAT90fYw6azatXSrFxJs3mhKJe0iroQHXEeAtT9IGunniZP1B745OnkUCZnCg7KcRxL26S9ZLM+yq6jvMBL/zno0889yRJidjvAzllF/jc2vsqKz0aZ3f3sbIV6xY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714990294; c=relaxed/simple; bh=f5Cv44/3AGGbCxZDcYogan0gqp+nPZa9mRSVy/zh26o=; h=MIME-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Content-Type; b=UFPlWake5vgKiqh2nt/E290mEYPKaKajX8hddL8cqwEs3wLWoSio2owQN3H4swGGF1/2O1GN3ZTD+ZqfgZm+bBUqhzBvyjnOJbq0pvf0bFOdDYLBwGpWTjBFAdFXokzwtslBRxO5RFOs08j+iMhgl6haso7CpEF9YMTcGvbE+Wo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b=kvYRae4s; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=cuh6Np1A; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.123.146 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arndb.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arndb.de header.i=@arndb.de header.b="kvYRae4s"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="cuh6Np1A" Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5429D1C00143; Mon, 6 May 2024 06:11:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap51 ([10.202.2.101]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 06 May 2024 06:11:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arndb.de; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1714990290; x=1715076690; bh=5sLzUkKc+UKzUKMy1Lp+sOpGVEF5QsoSKivd+RWMiRI=; b= kvYRae4s2eHBdTdrxzwywAY0GL/MaDl2Get5cfeUq3T+U3fcR6q79UubUM0fAW9u +I/CDDZFGrJSf9jzq8zYhNmoIyR+lrI+mWQZGeslVdlwAj9Oq+myLFqHf/cd7jKo oNvFS1LXdDGwkJtl9R8Gu/j2WzyCj8pEvyWNsij0FXvrMwN7SNgPXzEo7TskCCQi EfdbBw08RRqkd+04cEL+kMwK4X54x7uVboTkxetSj9uNhsWZJEduEkB5eIvmTy3G vXP/PnkOixZAONBWJwxFNCF4utCHHRpTzyM7fuHafxefOtO2D9rpgIr/gd3T0I+X z8WpXRAJwGIuCH+8tnHwuw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1714990290; x= 1715076690; bh=5sLzUkKc+UKzUKMy1Lp+sOpGVEF5QsoSKivd+RWMiRI=; b=c uh6Np1AwzMtBUszkARvJ0h/Zl9RzgnvAAQqercW3KRBNzDkyjTBCMNHiV/Ze1e14 okbAqdy7xeuzVYqJUOIICjxL75va06AXEbGcAPh6BhgxR3fR+LfVZNFIu5rJAjvq bgxdnatW2MehNqi3WeVB46GvaLemGaiu1zWDHLVEj7i4s/pZBMIbVD6sdgai4aBf 7PzmySiUYPPkab/cbaGjr1PEjN7h51fIgRDZn25QjkzMPuKc33i1q8sGm/xIE2ui Pug1ZEt26y1+mP3NVv82pV1V+vjAwu9WrwAVrH6p/RfzLkQZMuoZBw3qrX80H1lM iMV0sqXMJcCVMCeIclp+w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrvddviedgvdehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvfevufgtgfesthhqredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdet rhhnugcuuegvrhhgmhgrnhhnfdcuoegrrhhnugesrghrnhgusgdruggvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpefgkeeuleegieeghfduudeltdekfeffjeeuleehleefudettddtgfevueef feeigeenucffohhmrghinhepkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg eptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghrnhgusegrrhhnuggsrdguvg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 58C75B6008D; Mon, 6 May 2024 06:11:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-437-gcad818a2a-fm-20240502.001-gcad818a2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <20240503081125.67990-1-arnd@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 12:11:10 +0200 From: "Arnd Bergmann" To: "Michael Cree" Cc: "Matt Turner" , "Arnd Bergmann" , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, "Richard Henderson" , "Ivan Kokshaysky" , "Alexander Viro" , "Marc Zyngier" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] alpha: cleanups for 6.10 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 6, 2024, at 11:16, Michael Cree wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 10:15:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Fri, May 3, 2024, at 18:06, Matt Turner wrote: >> > On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 4:12=E2=80=AFAM Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> >> >> Al Viro did another series for alpha to address all the known build >> >> issues. I rebased his patches without any further changes and incl= uded >> >> it as a baseline for my work here to avoid conflicts. >>=20 >> I've pushed out the series with the additional Acks to >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic.git/= log/?h=3Dalpha-cleanup-6.9 >> and merged it into the main asm-generic branch for 6.10. >>=20 >> Can you give this a quick test on one of your machines to make >> sure I didn't introduce a stupid regression somewhere? > > I built a dp264 specific kernel and its working fine on an XP1000 > (EV67 arch). Just built a generic kernel (as that's probably a more > important test) and that is also working fine on the XP1000. Thanks a lot for testing! > I also built a titan specific kernel to test on an ES45 (SMP EV68 > arch) but that OOPSes early in the boot process with a kernel null > pointer access. I suspect that has nothing to do with your patches > as I have a recollection that I have seen that OOPS before. Ok > So I tried the same generic kernel that I have running on the XP1000 > but that fails to unpack at the initial boot stage (!) with: Just to be sure: this is not a regression from my patches either, right? I would expect that any EV6 (or later) target specific kernel didn't change much at all from my patches, while the generic kernel changing from -march=3Dev4 to -march=3Dev56 is certainly meant to be different (in a good way, with smaller size and faster execution). Arnd