From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Valentin Schneider Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] trace: Add trace_ipi_send_cpumask() Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:24:53 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20230307143558.294354-1-vschneid@redhat.com> <20230307143558.294354-2-vschneid@redhat.com> <20230322093955.GR2017917@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20230322103004.GA571242@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=wmDgNMv9DxKQvBLwcoENUsqQKTp3ZqK1Y/MfhzUdTtI=; b=eynaQwrYyCsH7p zJCbi66IJQXhhWRiCQcbM5B0ptaiT2GkVIMg0hAjRmqvDBrIxYiwRjkY7jmMSDNy9/ct/ZsOzXQHs Mpx36jfVk5ttCdIVx8TjmUe5cMfAym8+2Bg6V3+s4zMYSyUvccSB/B/3YWO/LqfCKCaINMi4yaA0T DC4AT/pV1z/kB/jCZ71SjyOXgR6RcQp4FX0y94su2Zh8NnyVJGgij0hKd3RSz+QlMUFImRTkTA8eO qZgwqZFeEcU4gR8WmSFuYHOj6Y/HuftQUg0yZBHtRes8u72X7uoDih0tm+1Lfq+REq/sz6NvhoczV Hz8LqxBaaEcrkmcfqwzQ==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1679484303; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CeeQx+I+dRtKj5nSnz4ngzuZMZMfDzExS1NioY8sNjE=; b=YiHCcEMklnPO1Nnsc6FZEFkoAjKCP+8zw8PmMOPG8ZtoPhd4DcKa40P5t1WvJCGLw1i9/Z xGOfqk5p/rol+DVvScIDktQyC1nlY7yLxxbrXh4UjvoDYSbqbtgY4jZ09TLgqTzFSTXShx tE5Bxrp6JhkLWOsiCe7J+lRfmR19q+U= In-Reply-To: <20230322103004.GA571242@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+glpr-linux-riscv=m.gmane-mx.org@lists.infradead.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, x86@kernel.org, Steven Rostedt , "Paul E. McKenney" , Thomas Gleixner , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Juri Lelli , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Marcelo Tosatti , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar On 22/03/23 11:30, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:39:55AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 02:35:52PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote: >> > +TRACE_EVENT(ipi_send_cpumask, >> > + >> > + TP_PROTO(const struct cpumask *cpumask, unsigned long callsite, void *callback), >> > + >> > + TP_ARGS(cpumask, callsite, callback), >> > + >> > + TP_STRUCT__entry( >> > + __cpumask(cpumask) >> > + __field(void *, callsite) >> > + __field(void *, callback) >> > + ), >> > + >> > + TP_fast_assign( >> > + __assign_cpumask(cpumask, cpumask_bits(cpumask)); >> > + __entry->callsite = (void *)callsite; >> > + __entry->callback = callback; >> > + ), >> > + >> > + TP_printk("cpumask=%s callsite=%pS callback=%pS", >> > + __get_cpumask(cpumask), __entry->callsite, __entry->callback) >> > +); >> >> Would it make sense to add a variant like: ipi_send_cpu() that records a >> single cpu instead of a cpumask. A lot of sites seems to do: >> cpumask_of(cpu) for that first argument, and it seems to me it is quite >> daft to have to memcpy a full multi-word cpumask in those cases. >> >> Remember, nr_possible_cpus > 64 is quite common these days. > > Something we litte bit like so... > I was wondering whether we could stick with a single trace event, but let ftrace be aware of weight=1 vs weight>1 cpumasks. For weight>1, it would memcpy() as usual, for weight=1, it could write a pointer to a cpu_bit_bitmap[] equivalent embedded in the trace itself. Unfortunately, Ftrace bitmasks are represented as a u32 made of two 16 bit values: [offset in event record, size], so there isn't a straightforward way to point to a "reusable" cpumask. AFAICT the only alternative would be to do that via a different trace event, but then we should just go with a plain old uint - i.e. do what you're doing here, so: Tested-and-reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider (with the tiny typo fix below) > @@ -35,6 +35,28 @@ TRACE_EVENT(ipi_raise, > TP_printk("target_mask=%s (%s)", __get_bitmask(target_cpus), __entry->reason) > ); > > +TRACE_EVENT(ipi_send_cpu, > + > + TP_PROTO(const unsigned int cpu, unsigned long callsite, void *callback), > + > + TP_ARGS(cpu, callsite, callback), > + > + TP_STRUCT__entry( > + __field(unsigned int, cpu) > + __field(void *, callsite) > + __field(void *, callback) > + ), > + > + TP_fast_assign( > + __entry->cpu = cpu; > + __entry->callsite = (void *)callsite; > + __entry->callback = callback; > + ), > + > + TP_printk("cpu=%s callsite=%pS callback=%pS", ^ s/s/u/ > + __entry->cpu, __entry->callsite, __entry->callback) > +); > +