From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jbrunet@baylibre.com (Jerome Brunet)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 22:41:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] clk: meson: fix SET_PARM macro
In-Reply-To: <20170228212654.GM25384@codeaurora.org>
References: <20170228093016.5624-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com>
 <20170228212654.GM25384@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <1488318090.21996.2.camel@baylibre.com>
To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linus-amlogic.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 13:26 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 02/28, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> > parameter val is not enclosed in parenthesis which is buggy when
> > given an
> > expression instead of a simple value
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
> 
> Fixes tag? Is there a place in the code that is using a complex
> expression for val right now?
> 

Not if with what's already in, afaik. However "clk: meson: mpll: add rw
operation" I sent earlier today uses a ternary operator for val.
That's??how I found this issue. Instead of running the test, it would
always use the "else" clause.

I realize I should sent these patches in the same series.
Would you prefer me to do so ?

Jerome