linux-amlogic.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jbrunet@baylibre.com (Jerome Brunet)
To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/11] clk: take the prepare lock out of clk_core_set_parent
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 11:35:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1496050533.7514.9.camel@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <149573849978.52617.292626696549937056@resonance>

On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 11:54 -0700, Michael Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Jerome Brunet (2017-05-21 14:59:48)
> > 
> > Rework set_parent core function so it can be called when the prepare lock
> > is already held by the caller.
> > 
> > This rework is done to ease the integration of the "protected" clock
> > functionality.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
> 
> Applied to clk-next-protect for testing.
> 

Noted, I'll base the v3 on top of this branch

> Regards,
> Mike
> 
> > ---
> > ?drivers/clk/clk.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > ?1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > index fc58c52a26b4..f5c371532509 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > @@ -1787,7 +1787,8 @@ bool clk_has_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk
> > *parent)
> > ?}
> > ?EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_has_parent);
> > ?
> > -static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core *core, struct clk_core
> > *parent)
> > +static int clk_core_set_parent_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
> > +?????????????????????????????????????struct clk_core *parent)
> > ?{
> > ????????int ret = 0;
> > ????????int p_index = 0;
> > @@ -1796,23 +1797,16 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core
> > *core, struct clk_core *parent)
> > ????????if (!core)
> > ????????????????return 0;
> > ?
> > -???????/* prevent racing with updates to the clock topology */
> > -???????clk_prepare_lock();
> > -
> > ????????if (core->parent == parent)
> > -???????????????goto out;
> > +???????????????return 0;
> > ?
> > ????????/* verify ops for for multi-parent clks */
> > -???????if ((core->num_parents > 1) && (!core->ops->set_parent)) {
> > -???????????????ret = -ENOSYS;
> > -???????????????goto out;
> > -???????}
> > +???????if ((core->num_parents > 1) && (!core->ops->set_parent))
> > +???????????????return -ENOSYS;
> > ?
> > ????????/* check that we are allowed to re-parent if the clock is in use */
> > -???????if ((core->flags & CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE) && core->prepare_count) {
> > -???????????????ret = -EBUSY;
> > -???????????????goto out;
> > -???????}
> > +???????if ((core->flags & CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE) && core->prepare_count)
> > +???????????????return -EBUSY;
> > ?
> > ????????/* try finding the new parent index */
> > ????????if (parent) {
> > @@ -1820,8 +1814,7 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core *core,
> > struct clk_core *parent)
> > ????????????????if (p_index < 0) {
> > ????????????????????????pr_debug("%s: clk %s can not be parent of clk %s\n",
> > ????????????????????????????????????????__func__, parent->name, core->name);
> > -???????????????????????ret = p_index;
> > -???????????????????????goto out;
> > +???????????????????????return p_index;
> > ????????????????}
> > ????????????????p_rate = parent->rate;
> > ????????}
> > @@ -1831,7 +1824,7 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core *core,
> > struct clk_core *parent)
> > ?
> > ????????/* abort if a driver objects */
> > ????????if (ret & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK)
> > -???????????????goto out;
> > +???????????????return ret;
> > ?
> > ????????/* do the re-parent */
> > ????????ret = __clk_set_parent(core, parent, p_index);
> > @@ -1844,9 +1837,6 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core *core,
> > struct clk_core *parent)
> > ????????????????__clk_recalc_accuracies(core);
> > ????????}
> > ?
> > -out:
> > -???????clk_prepare_unlock();
> > -
> > ????????return ret;
> > ?}
> > ?
> > @@ -1869,10 +1859,17 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent(struct clk_core
> > *core, struct clk_core *parent)
> > ? */
> > ?int clk_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
> > ?{
> > +???????int ret;
> > +
> > ????????if (!clk)
> > ????????????????return 0;
> > ?
> > -???????return clk_core_set_parent(clk->core, parent ? parent->core : NULL);
> > +???????clk_prepare_lock();
> > +???????ret = clk_core_set_parent_nolock(clk->core,
> > +????????????????????????????????????????parent ? parent->core : NULL);
> > +???????clk_prepare_unlock();
> > +
> > +???????return ret;
> > ?}
> > ?EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_set_parent);
> > ?
> > @@ -2753,7 +2750,7 @@ void clk_unregister(struct clk *clk)
> > ????????????????/* Reparent all children to the orphan list. */
> > ????????????????hlist_for_each_entry_safe(child, t, &clk->core->children,
> > ??????????????????????????????????????????child_node)
> > -???????????????????????clk_core_set_parent(child, NULL);
> > +???????????????????????clk_core_set_parent_nolock(child, NULL);
> > ????????}
> > ?
> > ????????hlist_del_init(&clk->core->child_node);
> > --?
> > 2.9.4
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-29  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-21 21:59 [PATCH v2 00/11] clk: implement clock rate protection mechanism Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] clk: take the prepare lock out of clk_core_set_parent Jerome Brunet
2017-05-25 18:54   ` Michael Turquette
2017-05-29  9:35     ` Jerome Brunet [this message]
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] clk: add clk_core_set_phase_nolock function Jerome Brunet
2017-05-23  9:35   ` Adriana Reus
2017-05-23  9:48     ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-25 18:58       ` Michael Turquette
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] clk: rework calls to round and determine rate callbacks Jerome Brunet
2017-05-25 20:13   ` Michael Turquette
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] clk: use round rate to bail out early in set_rate Jerome Brunet
2017-05-25 20:20   ` Michael Turquette
2017-05-29  9:12     ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] clk: add support for clock protection Jerome Brunet
2017-05-25 20:58   ` Michael Turquette
2017-05-29  9:15     ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] clk: add clk_set_rate_protect Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] clk: rollback set_rate_range changes on failure Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] clk: cosmetic changes to clk_summary debugfs entry Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] clk: fix incorrect usage of ENOSYS Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] clk: fix CLK_SET_RATE_GATE with clock rate protection Jerome Brunet
2017-05-23 13:42   ` Adriana Reus
2017-05-23 15:09     ` Jerome Brunet
2017-05-21 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] clk: move CLK_SET_RATE_GATE protection from prepare to enable Jerome Brunet
2017-05-29  9:17   ` Jerome Brunet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1496050533.7514.9.camel@baylibre.com \
    --to=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).