From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: davem@davemloft.net (David Miller) Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 21:57:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [PATCH v3 0/5] meson: Meson8b and GXBB DWMAC glue driver In-Reply-To: References: <20160828161637.9941-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> <20160828.234008.445367966910278179.davem@davemloft.net> Message-ID: <20160830.215732.429612225008644820.davem@davemloft.net> To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linus-amlogic.lists.infradead.org From: Martin Blumenstingl Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:49:28 +0200 > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 5:40 AM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Martin Blumenstingl >> Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 18:16:32 +0200 >> >>> This adds a DWMAC glue driver for the PRG_ETHERNET registers found in >>> Meson8b and GXBB SoCs. Based on the "old" meson6b-dwmac glue driver >>> the register layout is completely different. >>> Thus I introduced a separate driver. >>> >>> Changes since v2: >>> - fixed unloading the glue driver when built as module. This pulls in a >>> patch from Joachim Eastwood (thanks) to get our private data structure >>> (bsp_priv). >> >> This doesn't apply cleanly at all to the net-next tree, so I have >> no idea where you expect these changes to be applied. > OK, maybe Kevin can me help out here as I think the patches should go > to various trees. > > I think patches 1, 3 and 4 should go through the net-next tree (as > these touch drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/ and the corresponding > documentation). > Patch 2 should probably go through clk-meson-gxbb / clk-next (just > like the other clk changes we had). > The last patch (patch 5) should probably go through the ARM SoC tree > (just like the other dts changes we had). > > @David, Kevin: would this be fine for you? I would prefer if all of the patches went through one tree, that way all the dependencies are satisfied in one place.