From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/bridge: dw_hdmi: add cec notifier support
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 12:45:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170706114555.GK4902@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <185aa90b-a1b2-d899-40bb-7d333f584bb5@baylibre.com>
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 01:29:54PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> On 07/06/2017 01:05 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 12:33:06PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> >> From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> >>
> >> Add CEC notifier support to the HDMI bridge driver, so that the CEC
> >> part of the IP can receive its physical address.
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> >> Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> >> Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> >> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> Hi Archit, Hans,
> >>
> >> This is repost of Russell's patch from his dw-hdmi CEC patchset.
> >>
> >> Since his CEC implementation will be integrated in the bridge driver,
> >> this notifier patch won't be re-posted.
> >>
> >> But the Amlogic Platform needs a notifier since it uses a standalone CEC
> >> controller.
> >
> > Without this, the dw-hdmi CEC support will be totally useless anyway,
> > and it's pointless to merge it without this patch.
> >
>
> Hi Russell,
>
> While following discussion on your last patchset, it seems you agreed with Hans
> to no more rely on the cec-notifier but directly call the dw-hdmi-cec functions.
Incorrect. I think you're looking at the discussion in "thread mode"
and assuming that messages are stored in date order...
There was a discussion about removing the cec-notifier which happened
on June 1st/2nd, based off the covering email.
However, there was a later discussion on June 9th (sparked by your
requirement) which changed the resolution from "lets remove the
notifier" to "we need to keep the notifier". This was based on
patch 2/4.
I never posted an updated patch set, because of the dependencies, but
Hans decided on June 12th to do I-don't-know-what with the patches I
sent, resulting in what we have queued up today. This brought the
sub-thread containing the cec-notifier removal discussion to be _after_
the June 9th discussion, which is probably what's causing some
confusion here.
However, I can assure you that the resolution of the discussion with
the cec-notifier was that it should remain in place - this is from
the last few messages in the discussion:
Hans wrote on 9th June:
| You wrote on 9th June:
| > It won't since the Meson platform needs it...
|
| Ah, I wasn't aware of that when I wrote my original comments. In that case
| we do need the notifier. Which is fine, as long as the reason for that is
| documented.
>From what you're saying, it sounds like the CEC dw-hdmi-cec.c still
relies on the notifier, but the patch which adds the CEC notifier
to dw-hdmi.c was omited from what Hans did, which will result in the
whole thing being a total waste of time.
> Anyway, if this patch is merged separately and you still depend on it,
> you could still rebase on it when it appears on drm-misc-next...
Well, from what I can see in 4.12, the cec-notifier stuff is rather
broken (tda998x has stopped working as its stuck with a physical
address of f.f.f.f) so I think the whole thing is rather moot right
now. I don't yet know what's going on with that, other than the
notifier stuff seems to not be working, despite being enabled in
the .config.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-06 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-06 10:33 [PATCH] drm/bridge: dw_hdmi: add cec notifier support Neil Armstrong
2017-07-06 10:43 ` Jose Abreu
2017-07-06 11:27 ` Neil Armstrong
2017-07-06 11:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-07-06 11:29 ` Neil Armstrong
2017-07-06 11:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2017-07-06 11:55 ` Neil Armstrong
2017-07-06 12:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-07-06 11:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-07-06 13:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-07-06 14:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-07-31 12:53 Neil Armstrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170706114555.GK4902@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).