From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:03:14 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v3 09/10] clk: fix incorrect usage of ENOSYS In-Reply-To: <20170612194438.12298-10-jbrunet@baylibre.com> References: <20170612194438.12298-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com> <20170612194438.12298-10-jbrunet@baylibre.com> Message-ID: <20170712020314.GX22780@codeaurora.org> To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linus-amlogic.lists.infradead.org On 06/12, Jerome Brunet wrote: > ENOSYS is special and should only be used for incorrect syscall number. > It does not seem to be the case here. > > Reported by checkpatch.pl while working on clock protection. > > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet Could also go earlier in the series. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project