From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: trini@konsulko.com (Tom Rini) Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 08:04:11 -0400 Subject: [PATCH u-boot 1/3] net: phy: Add Amlogic Meson GXL Internal PHY support In-Reply-To: <0921db70-a4bb-ea2e-d273-44280a2acc3c@baylibre.com> References: <1508313732-19282-1-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <1508313732-19282-2-git-send-email-narmstrong@baylibre.com> <0921db70-a4bb-ea2e-d273-44280a2acc3c@baylibre.com> Message-ID: <20171029120411.GV12185@bill-the-cat> To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linus-amlogic.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 03:39:17PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On 22/10/2017 16:36, Simon Glass wrote: > > On 18 October 2017 at 10:02, Neil Armstrong wrote: > >> The Amlogic Meson GXL/GXM families embeds an internal RMII Ethernet PHY. > >> > >> The PHY acts as a generic PHY but needs a slight configuration right > >> before it's configuration. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong > >> --- > >> drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 3 +++ > >> drivers/net/phy/Makefile | 1 + > >> drivers/net/phy/meson-gxl.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 3 +++ > >> include/phy.h | 1 + > >> 5 files changed, 65 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 drivers/net/phy/meson-gxl.c > > > > We really should create a uclass for PHY drivers before adding any > > more of these. > > > > Regards, > > Simon > > > > Hi Simon, > > Sure, this would indeed be necessary, but is it necessary to wait for > the uclass to merge mode PHYs ? Well, this isn't going in before the next release (along with all of the other amlogic stuff, which looks good otherwise btw). So, do you have time to take a pass at a uclass? -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: