From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: boris.brezillon@bootlin.com (Boris Brezillon) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:48:10 +0200 Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: add support for Amlogic NAND flash controller In-Reply-To: <96e538a5-1232-11f2-8b9e-5ddb09dcc2de@amlogic.com> References: <20180719094612.5833-1-yixun.lan@amlogic.com> <20180719094612.5833-3-yixun.lan@amlogic.com> <20180801235045.5b4d8211@bbrezillon> <42877a0d-9830-0626-3f64-e49a326eaa3c@amlogic.com> <20180817155608.5929b37a@bbrezillon> <96e538a5-1232-11f2-8b9e-5ddb09dcc2de@amlogic.com> Message-ID: <20180824144810.31c929a5@bbrezillon> To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linus-amlogic.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 22:08:42 +0800 Liang Yang wrote: > > You have to wait tWB, that's for sure. > > > we have a maximum 32 commands fifo. when command is written into > NFC_REG_CMD, it doesn't mean that command is executing right now, maybe > it is buffering on the queue.Assume one ERASE operation, when 2nd > command(0xd0) is written into NFC_REG_CMD and then come into > NAND_OP_WAITRDY_INSTR, if I read the RB status by register, it may be > wrong because 0xd0 may not being executed. it is unusual unless > buffering two many command. You should flush the queue and wait for it to empty at the end of ->exec_op(). > so it seems that i still need to use nand_soft_waitrdy or wait cmd is > executed somewhere. Don't you have a WAIT_FOR_RB instruction? What is NFC_CMD_RB for? Also, NFC_CMD_IDLE seems to allow you to add an arbitrary delay, and that's probably what you should use for tWB.