Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: pwm: amlogic: Add new bindings for meson A1 PWM

From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Cc: George Stark <gnstark@salutedevices.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	neil.armstrong@linaro.org, khilman@baylibre.com,
	jbrunet@baylibre.com, martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com,
	hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@salutedevices.com,
	Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@salutedevices.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: pwm: amlogic: Add new bindings for meson A1 PWM
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 17:08:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240910-kerchief-custody-a0741f9a256c@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ak53ha3kltm24s45n5pczvibtltzocg33inpnro4bjeolu25re@33lae7y7qzvw>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1352 bytes --]

On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 10:01:39AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 03:08:53PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 06:12:26PM +0300, George Stark wrote:
> > > Hello Rob, Conor
> > > 
> > > On 7/12/24 15:52, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 02:41:15AM +0300, George Stark wrote:
> > > > > The chip has 3 dual-channel PWM modules PWM_AB, PWM_CD, PWM_EF.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: George Stark <gnstark@salutedevices.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@salutedevices.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Missing ack from Conor. When you submit new versions, it is your
> > > > responsibility to add tags.
> > > 
> > > I had Conor's ack in my mind but his response was related to the
> > > squashed patch (a1 compatible + power domains) and the current patch was
> > > a bit different that's why I didn't dare to add the ack.
> > > 
> > > Conor, do you mind if I resend this patch (and may be [PATCH v4 1/3])
> > > with your ack?
> > 
> > Ye, both are fine :+1:
> 
> I interpreted that as an ack for patches 1 and 2 and applied these to
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git pwm/for-next
> . I guess that interpretation is fine, please tell me if not.

Yah, I was okaying my ack being added to both patches in a resend.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic