From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
Cc: lpieralisi@kernel.org, kwilczynski@kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, heiko@sntech.de, mani@kernel.org,
yue.wang@amlogic.com, pali@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
robh@kernel.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com, khilman@baylibre.com,
jbrunet@baylibre.com, martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] PCI: Configure root port MPS during host probing
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 12:48:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250902174828.GA1165373@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250620155507.1022099-2-18255117159@163.com>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:55:06PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
> Current PCIe initialization logic may leave root ports operating with
> non-optimal Maximum Payload Size (MPS) settings. While downstream device
> configuration is handled during bus enumeration, root port MPS values
> inherited from firmware or hardware defaults ...
Apparently Root Port MPS configuration is different from that for
downstream devices?
> might not utilize the full
> capabilities supported by the controller hardware. This can result in
> suboptimal data transfer efficiency across the PCIe hierarchy.
>
> During host controller probing phase, when PCIe bus tuning is enabled,
> the implementation now configures root port MPS settings to their
> hardware-supported maximum values. Specifically, when configuring the MPS
> for a PCIe device, if the device is a root port and the bus tuning is not
> disabled (PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF), the MPS is set to 128 << dev->pcie_mpss to
> match the Root Port's maximum supported payload size. The Max Read Request
> Size (MRRS) is subsequently adjusted through existing companion logic to
> maintain compatibility with PCIe specifications.
>
> Note that this initial setting of the root port MPS to the maximum might
> be reduced later during the enumeration of downstream devices if any of
> those devices do not support the maximum MPS of the root port.
>
> Explicit initialization at host probing stage ensures consistent PCIe
> topology configuration before downstream devices perform their own MPS
> negotiations. This proactive approach addresses platform-specific
> requirements where controller drivers depend on properly initialized
> root port settings, while maintaining backward compatibility through
> PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF conditional checks. Hardware capabilities are fully
> utilized without altering existing device negotiation behaviors.
This last paragraph seems kind of like marketing without any real
content. Is there something important in there?
Nits:
s/root port/Root Port/
Reword "implementation now configures" to be clear about whether "now"
refers to before this patch or after.
Update the MRRS "to maintain compatibility" part. I'm dubious about
there being a spec compatibility issue with respect to MRRS. Cite the
relevant section if there is an issue.
> Suggested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 4b8693ec9e4c..9f8803da914c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -2178,6 +2178,16 @@ static void pci_configure_mps(struct pci_dev *dev)
> return;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Unless MPS strategy is PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF (don't touch MPS at all),
> + * start off by setting root ports' MPS to MPSS. Depending on the MPS
> + * strategy, and the MPSS of the devices below the root port, the MPS
> + * of the root port might get overridden later.
> + */
> + if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT &&
> + pcie_bus_config != PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF)
> + pcie_set_mps(dev, 128 << dev->pcie_mpss);
> +
> if (!bridge || !pci_is_pcie(bridge))
> return;
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-02 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-20 15:55 [PATCH v5 0/2] Configure root port MPS during host probing Hans Zhang
2025-06-20 15:55 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] PCI: " Hans Zhang
2025-06-23 10:58 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-09-02 17:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-09-03 17:11 ` Hans Zhang
2025-09-03 17:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-09-04 10:13 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-11-04 15:00 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-11-04 16:32 ` Hans Zhang
2025-06-20 15:55 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] PCI: dwc: Remove redundant MPS configuration Hans Zhang
2025-06-20 16:05 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] Configure root port MPS during host probing Hans Zhang
2025-06-23 9:03 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-07-16 7:41 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-08-13 12:42 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-09-02 8:33 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250902174828.GA1165373@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=yue.wang@amlogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox