From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Guangshuo Li" <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: meson: ge2d: avoid double free on video register failure
Date: Sun, 17 May 2026 12:29:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260517122955.29299C2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260517115343.955015-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The patch's workaround for a double free violates kobject lifecycle rules, introducing a Use-After-Free.
- [High] Pre-existing Use-After-Free due to device-managed (devm) memory lifecycle mismatch with asynchronous character device operations.
--
commit 7ed6ce0ea116cd8dcd5ff2e1837f5d339cda90fa
Author: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
media: meson: ge2d: avoid double free on video register failure
This commit attempts to fix a double free when video_register_device
fails by temporarily assigning video_device_release_empty to the video
device release callback. It restores the original callback if registration
succeeds.
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/amlogic/meson-ge2d/ge2d.c b/drivers/media/platform/amlogic/meson-ge2d/ge2d.c
> index c5dc03905ce0f..b367169e6ad84 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/amlogic/meson-ge2d/ge2d.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/amlogic/meson-ge2d/ge2d.c
> @@ -983,6 +983,7 @@ static int ge2d_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> *vfd = ge2d_videodev;
> + vfd->release = video_device_release_empty;
Can this workaround introduce a use-after-free regression in the kobject core?
When __video_register_device fails inside device_register, it calls
put_device to drop the reference count. The driver core expects the release
callback to free the containing structure.
By temporarily substituting vfd->release with video_device_release_empty,
put_device will not free the memory synchronously. The driver then explicitly
frees the video_device in the error path via video_device_release.
However, put_device is not guaranteed to execute cleanup synchronously. If
asynchronous kobject release debugging is enabled, it schedules cleanup
asynchronously on a workqueue.
Explicitly freeing the video_device struct immediately after registration
fails could destroy the embedded device struct memory while the kobject core
still holds an asynchronous reference.
> vfd->lock = &ge2d->mutex;
> vfd->v4l2_dev = &ge2d->v4l2_dev;
Does the use of devm memory for the meson_ge2d struct create a lifecycle
mismatch with the video device?
The ge2d context is allocated via devm_kzalloc, which automatically frees
the memory when the driver unbinds. However, this context embeds fields
like v4l2_dev and mutex that are referenced by the video_device.
If a user process opens the video character device and holds the file
descriptor open, the video_device remains active even after the driver
unbinds and the devm memory is freed.
If the user later closes the file descriptor, the final reference drop
invokes v4l2_release, which dereferences vdev->v4l2_dev and attempts
to lock the freed ge2d->mutex, resulting in a use-after-free regression.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260517115343.955015-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com?part=1
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-17 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-17 11:53 [PATCH] media: meson: ge2d: avoid double free on video register failure Guangshuo Li
2026-05-17 12:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260517122955.29299C2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox