From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dmitry Baryshkov" <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] drm/connector: report out-of-band IRQ_HPD events
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2026 21:46:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260607214648.7EC8E1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608-hpd-irq-events-v4-1-30b62b335487@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] State machine race condition causes premature HPD (and IRQ) signaling before Alt Mode configuration completes.
- [High] DisplayPort is erroneously reported as connected (with IRQ) when CONFIGURE command is NAKed.
--
commit 3c420485b2e1143aa3ad7bdf4a86786959837b5a
Author: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
drm/connector: report out-of-band IRQ_HPD events
The DisplayPort standard defines a special kind of events called IRQ,
used to notify DP Source about the events on the Sink side. This commit
renames drm_connector_oob_hotplug_event() to drm_connector_dp_oob_status()
and extends its interface to report IRQ events to the DisplayPort Sink drivers.
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c b/drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c
> index 263a89c5f3243..ff3659b8f5a2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c
> @@ -187,9 +187,11 @@ static int dp_altmode_status_update(struct dp_altmode *dp)
> dp->pending_irq_hpd = true;
> }
> } else {
> - drm_connector_oob_hotplug_event(dp->connector_fwnode,
> + drm_connector_dp_oob_status(dp->connector_fwnode,
> hpd ? connector_status_connected :
> - connector_status_disconnected);
> + connector_status_disconnected,
> + (hpd && irq_hpd) ? DRM_CONNECTOR_DP_IRQ_HPD :
> + DRM_CONNECTOR_NO_EXTRA_STATUS);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since we are modifying the hotplug
notification here, can a state machine race condition cause premature HPD
signaling before Alt Mode configuration completes?
If an Attention VDM arrives before the ACK for the DP_CMD_CONFIGURE,
dp_altmode_attention() will process it immediately because dp_altmode_work()
already set dp->state to DP_STATE_IDLE after sending the async command.
In dp_altmode_status_update(), the check for
!(con & DP_CONF_CURRENTLY(dp->data.conf)) evaluates to false because
dp->data.conf was already updated prior to sending the configure command.
Execution then falls into this else block, which calls
drm_connector_dp_oob_status() with connector_status_connected prematurely.
Does this cause DRM to begin link training before the physical MUX is
configured (which only happens in dp_altmode_notify() when the ACK arrives),
leading to a failed link and non-functional display?
> dp->hpd = hpd;
> sysfs_notify(&dp->alt->dev.kobj, "displayport", "hpd");
[ ... ]
> @@ -211,8 +213,11 @@ static int dp_altmode_configured(struct dp_altmode *dp)
> * configuration is complete to signal HPD.
> */
> if (dp->pending_hpd) {
> - drm_connector_oob_hotplug_event(dp->connector_fwnode,
> - connector_status_connected);
> + drm_connector_dp_oob_status(dp->connector_fwnode,
> + connector_status_connected,
> + dp->pending_irq_hpd ?
> + DRM_CONNECTOR_DP_IRQ_HPD :
> + DRM_CONNECTOR_NO_EXTRA_STATUS);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this logic erroneously
report a connected state even when the configure command is NAKed?
When the peer NAKs the DP_CMD_CONFIGURE command, dp_altmode_vdm() handles
the NAK by resetting dp->data.conf = 0 and then calling dp_altmode_configured().
If a prior STATUS_UPDATE VDM arrived with HPD high, dp->pending_hpd
will still be true.
Because this block checks dp->pending_hpd without verifying if the
configuration actually succeeded (for example, by checking if
dp->data.conf != 0), it unconditionally calls drm_connector_dp_oob_status()
with connector_status_connected.
Meanwhile, dp_altmode_notify() sets the MUX to TYPEC_STATE_USB because
dp->data.conf is 0.
Could this cause DRM to attempt DP link training over an unrouted AUX
channel, resulting in repeated timeouts and desynchronized state?
> sysfs_notify(&dp->alt->dev.kobj, "displayport", "hpd");
> dp->pending_hpd = false;
> if (dp->pending_irq_hpd) {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608-hpd-irq-events-v4-0-30b62b335487@oss.qualcomm.com?part=1
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-07 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-07 21:33 [PATCH v4 0/8] drm: handle IRQ_HPD events correctly Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] drm/connector: report out-of-band IRQ_HPD events Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:46 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09 13:20 ` Maxime Ripard
2026-06-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/connector: pass down IRQ_HPD to the drivers Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] drm/bridge: aux-hpd: let drivers pass IRQ_HPD events Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/bridge: pass extra events to the HPD callback Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-08 8:39 ` Francesco Dolcini
2026-06-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/bridge: pass down IRQ_HPD to the drivers Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] drm/msm: dp: handle the IRQ_HPD events reported by USB-C Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-08 6:12 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] soc: qcom: pmic-glink-altmode: pass down HPD_IRQ events Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 21:33 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] usb: typec: ucsi: huawei-gaokun: " Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-06-07 21:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-07 21:55 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260607214648.7EC8E1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox