From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ruoyu Wang" <ruoyuw560@gmail.com>
Cc: neil.armstrong@linaro.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: meson-spifc: fix runtime PM leak on remove
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 05:38:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609053838.2CFE31F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609052647.5-1-ruoyuw560@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Kernel stack memory is leaked to hardware registers when copying a partial 32-bit word.
- [High] During system resume, `meson_spifc_resume()` accesses SPI registers while the controller clock is disabled if the device was runtime suspended, triggering a system crash.
- [High] Direct 32-bit casts on potentially unaligned SPI buffers will cause unaligned memory access faults.
--
commit 65d4bcf61796efe6db17033eb44065b91fb07665
Author: Ruoyu Wang <ruoyuw560@gmail.com>
spi: meson-spifc: fix runtime PM leak on remove
This commit balances a pm_runtime_get_sync() call with pm_runtime_put_noidle()
in the remove function to fix a runtime PM usage counter leak.
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-meson-spifc.c b/drivers/spi/spi-meson-spifc.c
> index d700fa3152231..e36aa94bbdae3 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-meson-spifc.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-meson-spifc.c
> @@ -345,6 +345,7 @@ static void meson_spifc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
> }
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but could this leak uninitialized
kernel stack memory to hardware registers?
In meson_spifc_fill_buffer(), when the remaining length is less than 4 bytes:
drivers/spi/spi-meson-spifc.c:meson_spifc_fill_buffer() {
...
while (i < len) {
if (len - i >= 4)
data = *(u32 *)buf;
else
memcpy(&data, buf, len - i);
regmap_write(spifc->regmap, REG_C0 + i, data);
...
}
If len - i < 4, memcpy() copies only 1 to 3 bytes into the local 32-bit
variable data. The remaining bytes in data are left uninitialized.
The entire 32-bit variable is then written to the REG_C0 register,
potentially leaking kernel stack memory.
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but can this cause a synchronous
external abort during system resume?
In meson_spifc_resume(), the clock is not enabled if the device was runtime
suspended:
drivers/spi/spi-meson-spifc.c:meson_spifc_resume() {
...
if (!pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) {
ret = clk_prepare_enable(spifc->clk);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
meson_spifc_hw_init(spifc);
...
}
meson_spifc_hw_init() unconditionally writes to hardware registers via
regmap_update_bits().
If the device was runtime suspended, the clock remains disabled, and
accessing unclocked peripheral registers can cause a system crash.
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but will this cause unaligned
memory access faults?
Both meson_spifc_drain_buffer() and meson_spifc_fill_buffer() cast the
generic u8 *buf pointer directly to u32 * to perform 4-byte operations:
drivers/spi/spi-meson-spifc.c:meson_spifc_drain_buffer() {
...
if (len - i >= 4) {
*((u32 *)buf) = data;
buf += 4;
} else {
...
}
And similarly in meson_spifc_fill_buffer():
drivers/spi/spi-meson-spifc.c:meson_spifc_fill_buffer() {
...
while (i < len) {
if (len - i >= 4)
data = *(u32 *)buf;
else
...
}
The SPI subsystem does not guarantee that tx_buf or rx_buf are 4-byte
aligned. Casting and dereferencing them as 32-bit pointers constitutes
undefined behavior in C and can lead to alignment faults depending on
the architecture.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609052647.5-1-ruoyuw560@gmail.com?part=1
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 5:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 5:26 [PATCH] spi: meson-spifc: fix runtime PM leak on remove Ruoyu Wang
2026-06-09 5:38 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-09 23:06 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260609053838.2CFE31F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=ruoyuw560@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox