From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Doruk Tan Ozturk" <doruk@0sec.ai>
Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: meson: vdec: fix use-after-free of decode work in stop/close path
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 14:32:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260615143207.ED60E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615140529.52653-1-doruk@0sec.ai>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Missing IRQ synchronization allows a delayed threaded IRQ to re-arm the worker after `cancel_work_sync()` completes, leading to multiple Use-After-Free bugs.
- [High] `vdec_poweroff()` disables hardware clocks while the worker thread is actively executing or sleeping, leading to fatal unclocked register accesses.
- [High] Unchecked return value of `kthread_run()` leads to a kernel panic in `vdec_stop_streaming()`.
- [High] The V4L2 control handler `sess->ctrl_handler` is never freed, leaking memory on every device close.
- [High] The `sess->priv` structure is leaked if `vdec_start_streaming()` fails.
--
commit 80c252d67b7235edb63d6a1fcdbbdfe975a45e0c
Author: Doruk Tan Ozturk <doruk@0sec.ai>
Subject: media: meson: vdec: fix use-after-free of decode work in stop/close path
This commit attempts to fix a use-after-free condition by cancelling
esparser_queue_work during vdec_stop_streaming(). It places the
cancellation after the hardware is quiesced to ensure the worker is not
re-armed by new interrupts.
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/vdec.c b/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/vdec.c
> index a039d925c0fe5..74b44f7f7ad7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/vdec.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/vdec.c
> @@ -419,6 +419,16 @@ static void vdec_stop_streaming(struct vb2_queue *q)
> sess->status = STATUS_STOPPED;
> }
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does kthread_stop() handle
errors safely here?
Earlier in vdec_stop_streaming(), the code calls:
kthread_stop(sess->recycle_thread);
In vdec_start_streaming(), sess->recycle_thread is initialized with
kthread_run(), but the return value isn't checked for ERR_PTR.
If thread creation fails, kthread_stop() will attempt to dereference the
invalid pointer, resulting in a fatal page fault.
>
> + /*
> + * The esparser_queue_work worker dereferences sess->m2m_ctx and
> + * sess->lock. The hardware (and its IRQ, which re-arms the work via
> + * amvdec_buf_done()) has been quiesced by vdec_poweroff() above, so
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does vdec_poweroff() safely quiesce the
hardware while the worker is still running?
vdec_stop_streaming() calls vdec_poweroff() before we cancel the work.
The worker thread esparser_queue_all_src() can block in esparser_write_data()
for up to 200ms.
Since vdec_poweroff() disables hardware clocks without holding sess->lock,
the worker could wake up and attempt to write to PARSER_FETCH_CMD while
clocks are disabled. Can this cause an asynchronous external abort and panic?
> + * no new work can be scheduled past this point. m2m_ctx is still
> + * valid here. Wait for any in-flight worker to finish before the
> + * buffers and (on the close path) m2m_ctx are torn down.
> + */
> + cancel_work_sync(&sess->esparser_queue_work);
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is cancel_work_sync() sufficient without
synchronizing IRQs first?
While vdec_poweroff() stops new hardware IRQs, it does not call
synchronize_irq().
If the threaded IRQ handler (vdec_threaded_isr) is already scheduled and
delayed, it can execute concurrently or after this cancellation.
The ISR would then call dst_buf_done(), which invokes:
schedule_work(&sess->esparser_queue_work);
Could this re-arm the worker after cancel_work_sync() has completed,
leading to a second use-after-free when the worker later dereferences
the freed sess->m2m_ctx?
[ ... ]
Additionally, I noticed a couple of other pre-existing issues in this file:
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does vdec_close() leak the V4L2 control
handler?
vdec_open() initializes sess->ctrl_handler via vdec_init_ctrls() and
v4l2_ctrl_handler_init(), allocating memory for the controls.
However, vdec_close() does not free it:
vdec_close() {
...
v4l2_m2m_ctx_release(sess->m2m_ctx);
v4l2_m2m_release(sess->m2m_dev);
v4l2_fh_del(&sess->fh, file);
v4l2_fh_exit(&sess->fh);
...
}
Since the V4L2 core does not automatically free control handlers during
v4l2_fh_exit(), is this memory leaked every time a device is closed?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the error path in
vdec_start_streaming() leak sess->priv?
In vdec_start_streaming(), vdec_poweron() allocates sess->priv via
load_extended_firmware() (for example, allocating struct codec_h264).
If a subsequent initialization step fails, the error path calls the codec's
stop routine:
vdec_start_streaming() {
...
ret = vdec_poweron(sess);
if (ret)
goto vififo_free;
...
}
The stop routine (e.g. codec_h264_stop) cleans up DMA memory but fails to
kfree() the codec structure itself.
Because the stream never starts, vdec_stop_streaming() is never invoked.
Does this leave sess->priv permanently leaked?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260615140529.52653-1-doruk@0sec.ai?part=1
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 14:05 [PATCH] media: meson: vdec: fix use-after-free of decode work in stop/close path Doruk Tan Ozturk
2026-06-15 14:32 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260615143207.ED60E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=doruk@0sec.ai \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox