From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Alfie Varghese" <alfievarghese22@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: media: meson: vdec: propagate devm_clk_get() errors
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:26:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260713172646.8D3601F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260713171644.691-1-alfievarghese22@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] The asynchronous worker `esparser_queue_work` is scheduled but never explicitly canceled, leading to a Use-After-Free when the file descriptor is closed.
- [High] Potential NULL pointer dereference when accessing `of_id->data` if `of_match_node()` returns NULL.
- [High] Missing cleanup of V4L2 control handler in the session release path causes a memory leak.
- [High] Early IRQ request allows spurious or pending interrupts to dereference a NULL `core->cur_sess`.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] staging: media: meson: vdec: propagate devm_clk_get() errors ---
commit e254e1429efee5a0b94f582e6b31b4ef82669c9a
Author: Alfie Varghese <alfievarghese22@gmail.com>
staging: media: meson: vdec: propagate devm_clk_get() errors
This commit modifies vdec_probe() to propagate actual error codes returned
by devm_clk_get() instead of hardcoding -EPROBE_DEFER. It prevents the
driver core from retrying probes indefinitely when encountering real
errors like -ENOMEM or -ENOENT.
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/vdec.c b/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/vdec.c
> index a039d925c0fe5..fba1e7f88d81f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/vdec.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/vdec.c
> @@ -1026,24 +1026,24 @@ static int vdec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code handle the case where
of_match_node() returns NULL? If the driver is bound manually via sysfs
to a platform device lacking a device tree node, of_match_node()
returns NULL.
drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/vdec.c:vdec_probe() {
...
of_id = of_match_node(vdec_dt_match, dev->of_node);
core->platform = of_id->data;
...
}
Could this lead to a NULL pointer dereference when accessing of_id->data?
> core->platform->revision == VDEC_REVISION_SM1) {
> core->vdec_hevcf_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "vdec_hevcf");
> if (IS_ERR(core->vdec_hevcf_clk))
> - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + return PTR_ERR(core->vdec_hevcf_clk);
> }
>
[ ... ]
> core->vdec_hevc_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "vdec_hevc");
> if (IS_ERR(core->vdec_hevc_clk))
> - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + return PTR_ERR(core->vdec_hevc_clk);
>
> irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "vdec");
> if (irq < 0)
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it safe to request the IRQ before
the session state is initialized?
drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/vdec.c:vdec_probe() {
...
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(core->dev, irq, vdec_isr,
vdec_threaded_isr, IRQF_ONESHOT,
"vdec", core);
...
}
If a spurious interrupt or a pending interrupt from the bootloader fires
immediately, the ISR dereferences core->cur_sess:
drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/vdec.c:vdec_isr() {
...
struct amvdec_session *sess = core->cur_sess;
sess->last_irq_jiffies = get_jiffies_64();
...
}
Will this cause a NULL pointer dereference since the session state isn't
established until later?
[Severity: Critical]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but is there a use-after-free
risk when the file descriptor is closed?
If userspace queues a buffer (which schedules sess->esparser_queue_work)
and immediately closes the file descriptor, vdec_close() frees the
session context without syncing:
drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/vdec.c:vdec_close() {
...
kfree(sess);
...
}
However, the asynchronous worker doesn't appear to be explicitly
canceled with cancel_work_sync(), and might dereference the freed
pointer:
drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/esparser.c:esparser_queue_all_src() {
...
struct amvdec_session *sess =
container_of(work, struct amvdec_session, esparser_queue_work);
mutex_lock(&sess->lock);
...
}
Can this lead to memory corruption if the worker runs after the release?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does vdec_close() properly clean up
the V4L2 control handler?
The handler is initialized via v4l2_ctrl_handler_init() during open,
allocating internal control structures, but vdec_close() seems to omit
the corresponding teardown call before freeing the session context:
drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/vdec.c:vdec_close() {
...
kfree(sess);
...
}
If an unprivileged user repeatedly opens and closes the device, could
this leak kernel memory and eventually cause an out-of-memory condition?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260713171644.691-1-alfievarghese22@gmail.com?part=1
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-13 17:16 [PATCH] staging: media: meson: vdec: propagate devm_clk_get() errors Alfie Varghese
2026-07-13 17:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-14 7:06 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260713172646.8D3601F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alfievarghese22@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox