Linux-Amlogic Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Xianwei Zhao" <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] spi: amlogic: spisg: Fix the incorrect keep_ss of the last descriptor
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 06:54:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260723065443.8DD251F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723-a9-spisg-v2-3-9fc39106b7e2@amlogic.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing pm_runtime_disable() and pm_runtime_put() in probe error path and remove().
- [High] Double-disable of clocks managed by devm_clk_get_enabled().
- [High] Race condition causing spurious -EBUSY transfer failures.
- [High] Target abort incorrectly signals successful transfer completion.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v2 3/4] spi: amlogic: spisg: Fix the incorrect keep_ss of the last descriptor ---
commit c9f43474b4fa19eea599df7045d868e70af19bd8
Author: Sunny Luo <sunny.luo@amlogic.com>
spi: amlogic: spisg: Fix the incorrect keep_ss of the last descriptor

This commit fixes the incorrect handling of the keep_ss state for the last
descriptor in the Amlogic SPISG driver. It ensures the CFG_KEEP_SS bit is
properly set based on the final transfer's cs_change value, ensuring the
chip select behaves correctly even when a cs-hold delay is present.

> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-amlogic-spisg.c b/drivers/spi/spi-amlogic-spisg.c
> index a6123975a37cf..2d66f00dccd45 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-amlogic-spisg.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-amlogic-spisg.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -539,13 +542,17 @@ static int aml_spisg_transfer_one_message(struct spi_controller *ctlr,
>  				       xfer->effective_speed_hz);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (cs_hold_in_sclk)
> +	if (cs_hold_in_sclk) {
>  		/* additional null-descriptor to achieve the cs-hold delay */
>  		aml_spisg_setup_null_desc(spisg, desc, cs_hold_in_sclk);
> -	else
>  		desc--;
> +		desc->cfg_bus |= FIELD_PREP(CFG_KEEP_SS, 1);
> +		desc++;
> +	} else {
> +		desc--;
> +	}
>  
> -	desc->cfg_bus |= FIELD_PREP(CFG_KEEP_SS, 0);
> +	FIELD_MODIFY(CFG_KEEP_SS, &desc->cfg_bus, last_xfer_keep_ss);
>  	desc->cfg_start |= FIELD_PREP(CFG_EOC, 1);
>  
>  	/* some tolerances */

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does calling spi_finalize_current_message()
before releasing the hardware lock open a race window for the next transfer?

In aml_spisg_transfer_one_message(), we have:

	msg->status = ret;
	spi_finalize_current_message(ctlr);
	aml_spisg_sem_up_write(spisg);

Since spi_finalize_current_message() signals the SPI core that the controller
is ready, could the SPI core immediately dispatch the next transfer on another
CPU, which then fails aml_spisg_sem_down_read() and aborts with -EBUSY?

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the target abort handler
incorrectly signal a successful transfer?

In aml_spisg_target_abort():

	spisg->status = 0;
	regmap_write(spisg->map, SPISG_REG_DESC_LIST_H, 0);
	complete(&spisg->completion);

And in aml_spisg_transfer_one_message():

	if (wait_for_completion_timeout(&spisg->completion,
					spi_controller_is_target(spisg->controller) ?
					MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT : msecs_to_jiffies(ms))) {
		ret = spisg->status ? -EIO : 0;

If a transfer is aborted, status is set to 0 and the wait completes. Does
this cause the SPI client to incorrectly interpret an aborted transfer as
fully successful?

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but do the probe error path and remove
functions leak PM runtime references?

In aml_spisg_probe(), the out_clk error path exits without disabling
PM runtime:

out_clk:
	if (spisg->core)
		clk_disable_unprepare(spisg->core);
	clk_disable_unprepare(spisg->pclk);

	return ret;

Additionally, aml_spisg_remove() does not call pm_runtime_disable():

static void aml_spisg_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
...
	if (!pm_runtime_suspended(&pdev->dev)) {

Does this prevent the device's power domain from suspending and cause
a kernel warning when rebinding?

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but are the devm-managed clocks
being double-disabled?

In aml_spisg_clk_init(), pclk is explicitly disabled:

	clk_set_min_rate(spisg->pclk, SPISG_PCLK_RATE_MIN);

	clk_disable_unprepare(spisg->pclk);

In the aml_spisg_probe() error path, both clocks are manually disabled:

out_clk:
	if (spisg->core)
		clk_disable_unprepare(spisg->core);
	clk_disable_unprepare(spisg->pclk);

And in aml_spisg_remove(), they are disabled again:

		clk_disable_unprepare(spisg->core);
		clk_disable_unprepare(spisg->pclk);

Since these clocks are acquired using devm_clk_get_enabled(), which
automatically registers a cleanup action, will manually disabling them
underflow the clock enable count and trigger warnings from the clock
framework?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260723-a9-spisg-v2-0-9fc39106b7e2@amlogic.com?part=3

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-23  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-23  6:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] spi: add support for Amlogic A9 Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-07-23  6:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] spi: dt-bindings: amlogic: spisg: Document A9-specific properties Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-07-23  6:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23  6:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] spi: amlogic: spisg: Fix transfer size limit and timeout handling Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-07-23  7:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-23  6:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] spi: amlogic: spisg: Fix the incorrect keep_ss of the last descriptor Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-07-23  6:54   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-23  6:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] spi: amlogic: spisg: Add support for A9 controller features Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-07-23  6:56   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260723065443.8DD251F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox