public inbox for linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jian Hu <jian.hu@amlogic.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Ronald Claveau <linux-kernel-dev@aliel.fr>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: amlogic: t7: Add clk measure support
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:40:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49d2e771-a940-4c75-a632-d2e159111c22@amlogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2074119-7b4b-4481-8e39-c822dd67000e@linaro.org>

Hi Ronald and Neil,


Thank you for your patient explanation.


On 4/20/2026 4:52 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
> On 4/20/26 05:25, Jian Hu wrote:
>> Hi Ronald,
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your review.
>>
>> On 4/17/2026 5:48 PM, Ronald Claveau wrote:
>>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>>
>>> Hello Jian,
>>>
>>> On 4/15/26 10:33 AM, Jian Hu via B4 Relay wrote:
>>>> From: Jian Hu <jian.hu@amlogic.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add the clock measure device to the T7 SoC family.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jian Hu <jian.hu@amlogic.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-t7.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-t7.dtsi 
>>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-t7.dtsi
>>>> index 7fe72c94ed62..cec2ea74850d 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-t7.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-t7.dtsi
>>>> @@ -701,6 +701,11 @@ pwm_ao_cd: pwm@60000 {
>>>>                                status = "disabled";
>>>>                        };
>>>>
>>>> +                     clock-measurer@48000 {
>>>> +                             compatible = "amlogic,t7-clk-measure";
>>>> +                             reg = <0x0 0x48000 0x0 0x1c>;
>>>> +                     };
>>>> +
>>> Can you please order by reg, it should be between pwm_ao_gh and pwm_ab.
>>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>> According to the "Order of Nodes" chapter in 
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst,
>>
>> nodes of the same type should be grouped together, and this takes 
>> higher priority.
>>
>> So I have placed the clock-measure node after all PWM nodes to avoid 
>> splitting the PWM group.
>
> This is not something we ever followed in the past, and I don't think 
> it makes sens here.
>
>
> """
> Alternatively for some subarchitectures, nodes of the same type can be
> grouped together, e.g. all I2C controllers one after another even if this
> breaks unit address ordering.
> """
>
> This doesn't apply here, so order strictly by address.
>
> Neil
>

Ok, I will order it by address in the next version.


Best regards,

Jian



_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-21  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-15  8:33 [PATCH v2 0/4] soc: amlogic: clk-measure: add A1 and T7 support Jian Hu via B4 Relay
2026-04-15  8:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: amlogic: clk-measure: Add A1 and T7 compatible Jian Hu via B4 Relay
2026-04-15 15:10   ` Conor Dooley
2026-04-15  8:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] soc: amlogic: clk-measure: Add A1 and T7 support Jian Hu via B4 Relay
2026-04-20  8:49   ` Neil Armstrong
2026-04-15  8:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: meson: a1: Add clk measure support Jian Hu via B4 Relay
2026-04-20  8:49   ` Neil Armstrong
2026-04-15  8:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: amlogic: t7: " Jian Hu via B4 Relay
2026-04-17  9:48   ` Ronald Claveau
2026-04-20  3:25     ` Jian Hu
2026-04-20  8:52       ` Neil Armstrong
2026-04-21  6:40         ` Jian Hu [this message]
2026-04-20  9:16       ` Ronald Claveau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49d2e771-a940-4c75-a632-d2e159111c22@amlogic.com \
    --to=jian.hu@amlogic.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-dev@aliel.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox