Re: [PATCH 0/2] iio: frequency: add iio support for Amlogic clock measure

[Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>]

Hi,

[+cc people from linux-msm]

On 24/06/2024 19:31, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> Add support for the HW found in most Amlogic SoC dedicated to measure
> system clocks.
> 
> This drivers aims to replace the one found in
> drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-clk-measure.c with following improvements:
> 
> * Access to the measurements through the IIO API:
>    Easier re-use of the results in userspace and other drivers
> * Controllable scale with raw measurements
> * Higher precision with processed measurements
> 
> Jerome Brunet (2):
>    dt-bindings: iio: frequency: add clock measure support
>    iio: frequency: add amlogic clock measure support
> 
>   .../iio/frequency/amlogic,clk-msr-io.yaml     |  50 ++
>   drivers/iio/frequency/Kconfig                 |  15 +
>   drivers/iio/frequency/Makefile                |   1 +
>   drivers/iio/frequency/amlogic-clk-msr-io.c    | 802 ++++++++++++++++++
>   4 files changed, 868 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/frequency/amlogic,clk-msr-io.yaml
>   create mode 100644 drivers/iio/frequency/amlogic-clk-msr-io.c
> 

While I really appreciate the effort, and the code looks cool, the clkmsr is really
a debug tool, and I'm not sure IIO is the right place for such debug tool ?

There's almost the same interface on qcom SoCs (https://github.com/linux-msm/debugcc) but
they chose to keep it in userspace until we find an appropriate way to expose
this from the kernel the right way.

If it enabled us to monitor a frequency input for a product use-case, IIO would be
the appropriate interface, but AFAIK it's only internal clocks and thus I'm worried
it's not the best way to expose those clocks.

Neil

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic