From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: add OTP (one-time-programmable) erase ioctl
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 14:06:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <05c255e6d9d8d12e8e6af59d9c153981@walle.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210302134617.5aa78cc4@xps13>
Hi,
Am 2021-03-02 13:46, schrieb Miquel Raynal:
> Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote on Tue, 2 Mar 2021 12:09:27
> +0100:
>
>> This may sound like a contradiction but some SPI-NOR flashes really
>> support erasing their OTP region until it is finally locked. Having
>> the
>> possibility to erase an OTP region might come in handy during
>> development.
>>
>> The ioctl argument follows the OTPLOCK style.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
>> ---
>> OTP support for SPI-NOR flashes may be merged soon:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20210216162807.13509-1-michael@walle.cc/
>>
>> Tudor suggested to add support for the OTP erase operation most
>> SPI-NOR
>> flashes have:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/d4f74b1b-fa1b-97ec-858c-d807fe1f9e57@microchip.com/
>>
>> Therefore, this is an RFC to get some feedback on the MTD side, once
>> this
>> is finished, I can post a patch for mtd-utils. Then we'll have a
>> foundation
>> to add the support to SPI-NOR.
>>
[..]
>> +int mtd_erase_user_prot_reg(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t
>> len)
>> +{
>> + struct mtd_info *master = mtd_get_master(mtd);
>> +
>> + if (!master->_erase_user_prot_reg)
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + if (!len)
>> + return 0;
>
> Should we add a sanity check enforcing that we don't try to access
> beyond the end of the OTP area?
This is checked in the op itself, as it is done for all the
other OTP read/write/lock ops.
Right at the moment, I don't see how this could be achieved in
an elegant way. Without additional changes, you'd have to call
mtd_get_user_prot_info() and iterate over the returned values
and figure out whether from and len are valid.
[..]
-michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-03 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-02 11:09 [RFC PATCH] mtd: add OTP (one-time-programmable) erase ioctl Michael Walle
2021-03-02 12:46 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-03-02 13:06 ` Michael Walle [this message]
2021-03-02 15:30 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2021-03-02 16:19 ` Michael Walle
2021-03-02 16:33 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2021-03-02 16:59 ` Michael Walle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=05c255e6d9d8d12e8e6af59d9c153981@walle.cc \
--to=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).