From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Brauner Subject: Re: Continuing the UAPI split Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 13:05:16 +0100 Message-ID: <0B17C6F2-DC2B-4192-B4AD-BD11D6B9F2B6@ubuntu.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: To: Elichai Turkel , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha , Florian Weimer List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org [+Cc Florian, glibc] On November 7, 2019 12:17:50 PM GMT+01:00, Elichai Turkel wrote: >Hi, >I'm working on a library that calls syscalls directly to the kernel=2E >`make hedears_install` is a great command to auto generate the UAPI >headers that are needed to call the kernel=2E > >But the headers are still missing a bunch of defines for flags and >structs=2E > >I wanted to know if patches to move more things from `=2E/include/linux` >to `=2E/include/uapi/linux` are welcome (obviously only >typedefs/defines/structs that are required for the syscalls) > >I think the UAPI is really close to getting a complete set of things >needed to communicate with the syscalls, but still not quite there=2E I >would like to push patches whenever I see missing things that my >library needs (that way it will be incrementally and by usage only)=2E > >Would love to get feedback=2E >Thanks, >Elichai=2E