From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Mackall Subject: Re: [patch 05/35] reintroduce accept4 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:37:06 -0600 Message-ID: <1227220626.3293.137.camel@calx> References: <200811192336.mAJNaE3R030021@imap1.linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, drepper-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 14:14 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org wrote: > > > From: Ulrich Drepper > > > > > > Introduce a new accept4() system call. The addition of this system call > > > > > /* test_accept4.c > > > > > #ifdef __x86_64__ > > > #define SYS_accept4 288 > > > #elif __i386__ > > ^^^^^^^^ > > defined(__i386__) > > > > > #define USE_SOCKETCALL 1 > > > #define SYS_ACCEPT4 18 > > > #else > > > #error "Sorry -- don't know the syscall # on this architecture" > > > #endif > > > > Anyway, it's just a test program. Succeeded on m68k using socketcall. > > It _should_ work even without the 'defined()'. Didn't it? Lots of symbols are defined with no value, which will result in an empty #if expression and a cpp error. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html