From: Dave Hansen <dave-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Oren Laadan <orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
jeremy-TSDbQ3PG+2Y@public.gmane.org,
arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org,
linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
Linux Torvalds <torvalds-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org>,
Alexander Viro
<viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v11][PATCH 05/13] Dump memory address space
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:05:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1229612720.17206.505.camel@nimitz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <494A2F94.2090800-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 06:10 -0500, Oren Laadan wrote:
> >> + mutex_lock(&mm->context.lock);
> >> +
> >> + hh->ldt_entry_size = LDT_ENTRY_SIZE;
> >> + hh->nldt = mm->context.size;
> >> +
> >> + cr_debug("nldt %d\n", hh->nldt);
> >> +
> >> + ret = cr_write_obj(ctx, &h, hh);
> >> + cr_hbuf_put(ctx, sizeof(*hh));
> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> + goto out;
> >> +
> >> + ret = cr_kwrite(ctx, mm->context.ldt,
> >> + mm->context.size * LDT_ENTRY_SIZE);
> >
> > Do we really want to emit anything under lock? I realize that this
> > patch goes and does a ton of writes with mmap_sem held for read -- is
> > this ok?
>
> Because all tasks in the container must be frozen during the checkpoint,
> there is no performance penalty for keeping the locks. Although the object
> should not change in the interim anyways, the locks protects us from, e.g.
> the task unfreezing somehow, or being killed by the OOM killer, or any
> other change incurred from the "outside world" (even future code).
>
> Put in other words - in the long run it is safer to assume that the
> underlying object may otherwise change.
>
> (If we want to drop the lock here before cr_kwrite(), we need to copy the
> data to a temporary buffer first. If we also want to drop mmap_sem(), we
> need to be more careful with following the vma's.)
>
> Do you see a reason to not keeping the locks ?
Mike, although we're doing writes of the checkpoint file here, the *mm*
access is read-only. We only need really mmap_sem for write if we're
creating new VMAs, which we only do on restore. Was there an action
taken on the mm that would require a write that we missed?
Oren, I never considered the locking overhead, either. The fact that
the processes are frozen is very, very important here. The code is fine
as it stands because this *is* a very simple way to do it. But, this
probably deserves a comment.
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-18 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-05 17:31 [RFC v11][PATCH 00/13] Kernel based checkpoint/restart Oren Laadan
2008-12-05 17:31 ` [RFC v11][PATCH 01/13] Create syscalls: sys_checkpoint, sys_restart Oren Laadan
2008-12-05 17:31 ` [RFC v11][PATCH 04/13] x86 support for checkpoint/restart Oren Laadan
2008-12-17 2:19 ` Mike Waychison
2008-12-17 15:23 ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-05 17:31 ` [RFC v11][PATCH 06/13] Restore memory address space Oren Laadan
2008-12-05 17:31 ` [RFC v11][PATCH 10/13] External checkpoint of a task other than ourself Oren Laadan
2008-12-05 17:31 ` [RFC v11][PATCH 13/13] Restart multiple processes Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <1228498282-11804-1-git-send-email-orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-05 17:31 ` [RFC v11][PATCH 02/13] Checkpoint/restart: initial documentation Oren Laadan
2008-12-05 17:31 ` [RFC v11][PATCH 03/13] General infrastructure for checkpoint restart Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <1228498282-11804-4-git-send-email-orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-06 7:26 ` Joe Perches
2008-12-16 19:04 ` Mike Waychison
2008-12-16 19:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-12-16 21:54 ` Mike Waychison
2008-12-16 22:14 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-16 22:43 ` Mike Waychison
2008-12-17 0:13 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-16 23:42 ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-17 0:42 ` Mike Waychison
2008-12-17 2:08 ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-05 17:31 ` [RFC v11][PATCH 05/13] Dump memory address space Oren Laadan
2008-12-18 2:26 ` Mike Waychison
2008-12-18 11:10 ` Oren Laadan
[not found] ` <494A2F94.2090800-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-18 15:05 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2008-12-18 15:54 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-18 20:00 ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-18 18:15 ` Mike Waychison
[not found] ` <494A9350.1060309-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-18 18:21 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-18 20:11 ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-05 17:31 ` [RFC v11][PATCH 07/13] Infrastructure for shared objects Oren Laadan
2008-12-05 17:31 ` [RFC v11][PATCH 08/13] Dump open file descriptors Oren Laadan
2008-12-05 17:31 ` [RFC v11][PATCH 09/13] Restore open file descriprtors Oren Laadan
2008-12-05 17:31 ` [RFC v11][PATCH 10/13] External checkpoint of a task other than ourself Oren Laadan
2008-12-05 17:31 ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-05 17:31 ` [RFC v11][PATCH 11/13] Track in-kernel when we expect checkpoint/restart to work Oren Laadan
2008-12-05 17:31 ` [RFC v11][PATCH 12/13] Checkpoint multiple processes Oren Laadan
2008-12-05 17:31 ` [RFC v11][PATCH 13/13] Restart " Oren Laadan
2008-12-05 17:31 ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-06 0:19 ` [RFC v11][PATCH 00/13] Kernel based checkpoint/restart Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-09 19:42 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-16 18:43 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1229612720.17206.505.camel@nimitz \
--to=dave-23vcf4htsmix0ybbhkvfkdbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jeremy-TSDbQ3PG+2Y@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mikew-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org \
--cc=orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=torvalds-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).