From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:05:47 -0800 Message-ID: <1234285547.30155.6.camel@nimitz> References: <1233076092-8660-1-git-send-email-orenl@cs.columbia.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1233076092-8660-1-git-send-email-orenl@cs.columbia.edu> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Oren Laadan Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Linus Torvalds , Alexander Viro , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 12:07 -0500, Oren Laadan wrote: > Checkpoint-restart (c/r): a couple of fixes in preparation for 64bit > architectures, and a couple of fixes for bugss (comments from Serge > Hallyn, Sudakvev Bhattiprolu and Nathan Lynch). Updated and tested > against v2.6.28. > > Aiming for -mm. Is there anything that we're waiting on before these can go into -mm? I think the discussion on the first few patches has died down to almost nothing. They're pretty reviewed-out. Do they need a run in -mm? I don't think linux-next is quite appropriate since they're not _quite_ aimed at mainline yet. -- Dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org